Search for: "State v. Austin"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 2,953
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2010, 2:24 am
The disputed domain name in Webvisions Pte Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Univ. of Texas at Austin, No. 09-50822, -- F. 3 – (cert. granted, No. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
University of Texas at Austin, 14-981, involves an Equal Protection Clause challenge to UT’s use of race in undergraduate admissions. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 9:33 am
Recently, an Austin man was sent to prison for 78 months for such an involvement. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Christopher Novus Davis v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
AT TEXAS (AUSTIN) 1 (2019) and Cyber-World War III: Origins, 7 J.L. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
Francis Professor in Law Associate Dean for Academic Affairs Director, Strauss Center for International Security & Law The University of Texas at Austin Before the House Armed Services Committee February 26, 2015 “Outside Perspectives on the President’s Proposed Authorization for the Use of Military Force Against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant” Chairman Thornberry, Ranking Member Smith, and members of the committee, thank you for the… [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
"); Braten v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 4:38 pm
VLASTELICA v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:29 am
DeVita, Austin V. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:17 pm
The Oklahoma case is Cline, et al, v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 2:01 pm
App. -- Austin 2003). [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
Same with Austin "Jack" DeCoster of Wright County Egg, which was linked to as many as 1,700 illnesses from Salmonella in its eggs in 2010. [read post]
25 May 2021, 10:00 am
Woodson v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:21 am
Casey and Bush v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:14 am
The Court had agreed to review a New Orleans case that presented the issue of whether Miller v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 9:28 am
Wash.) in Sullivan v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 5:53 am
Austin, 545 U. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
If Peter raises the First Amendment as a defense, he loses--even though Deirdre is invoking the power of the state (in the form of the judge) to obtain an order to Peter that he pay damages.Some readers at this point might be thinking: what about Shelley v. [read post]
