Search for: "State v. Bias"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 5,335
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2013, 12:00 am
Magarian’s comments on today’s decisions follow: The DOMA decision, United States v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am
”Employers have been sued for alleged defamation of an employee founded on postings made on the employer's web site as the decision in Firth v State of New York, 98 NY2d 365, demonstrates. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:08 pm
In R. v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:40 am
Pelzer and Groh v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
There was no suggestion of actual bias; rather, it was apparent bias that was the problem, hence the old maxim, attributed by the judge to Lord Hewart CJ in R (McCarthy) v Sussex Justices [1924] 1 KB 256 at 259, namely that “it is … of fundamental importance that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done”. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 4:00 pm
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 1:03 pm
The Supreme Court’s decision in Babb v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 11:26 am
In Bose v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:23 am
Penry v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
* * * Back in March of this year, the United States Supreme Court in Staub v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 11:46 am
Yu, et al. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 4:09 am
OpinionShort Title/District 07a0467p.06 Pepaj v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 6:14 am
A federal district court in New York found plausible her Title VII and New York City Human Rights Law claims that after she criticized the new director’s qualifications and sought salary increases for her female subordinates, the exec fired her due to gender bias; they were not made implausible by either the same actor inference or the allegedly economic reasons for her termination (Bivens v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 12:07 pm
See Brackeen v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 8:11 am
Sparrow and Delgamuukw v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:35 am
” Specifically, in Pinkard v. [read post]
A federal court just made it hecka-hard to prove age discrimination at work. But, did it go too far?
16 Feb 2021, 3:30 am
In 2008, the Supreme Court in Gross v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 8:07 pm
For the information of those wanting to discount my bias, I went into the Group V debate with no clear idea of who I wanted to vote for. [read post]
8 May 2010, 9:15 am
The Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in Tus v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:53 pm
Ogman, No. 06-0203 "A sentence for conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute and possession with intent to distribute cocaine base is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in considering both convictions in sentencing defendant; and 2) the decision in United States v. [read post]
