Search for: "State v. Charles"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 4,374
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Charles Pfizer & Co., 532 P.2d 1377, 1382 (Okla. 1974); Dole Food Co. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:28 am
On September 23, 2015, the Fifth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 10:30 am
Hooks III et al. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 5:27 pm
See U.S. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court case as vividly presents the important symbiotic relationship between structural political inequality and structural racial inequality as does Gomillion v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:47 am
This conclusion was firmly based on Paedergat Boat and Racquet Club, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 9:46 am
Souratgar v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 10:18 am
Bone, Charles Silver, and Patrick Woolley). [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:37 am
” The Des Moines Register reports that Senator Charles Grassley “is again encouraging the U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 12:39 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Terri Cole v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 1:02 pm
‘The defendant’s submission on this point does not seem to me to belong to the real world of this litigation,’ it states. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:59 am
Minnesota v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 12:08 pm
Huff v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:50 pm
Following oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 10:44 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Charles A. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 9:46 pm
(George Washington, Charles Willson Peale c 1779-81 (American, Chester, Maryland 1741–1827 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania))Summary of ContentsContentsPrefaceAcknowledgementsPart I: What is Law? [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 8:17 am
TRADE MARKSLise Charles (WTR) provides an overview of the most-read posts on Word Trademark Review (WTR) on European trade mark case law over the past year, including analyses of cases dealing with issues such as unconventional signs (i.e., colour marks and 3D marks) (MHCS v EUIPO | Case T-274/20 and Guerlain v EUIPO | Case T-488/20), the risks of using a mark in a manner other than that registered (Fashioneast Sàrl v EUIPO | Case T-297/20) and taking… [read post]
23 May 2016, 9:19 am
In the case, Quilez-Velar v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:20 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
