Search for: "State v. English"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 6,457
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 1:06 pm
Plain English summary: The Court’s decision in BG Group plc v. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 4:03 pm
Plain English Issue: Whether the state courts in this case erred in concluding that any violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights at his criminal trial was harmless. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 7:51 am
As it did, a 2010 Honda CR-V driven by 42-year-old Marisa Lovell of Clayton hit the front of the [SUV]. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 4:12 am
He is being held without bail at the Joseph V. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 3:07 pm
See Miller v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Conclusion Whilst this judgment clearly confirms that the concept of lawful act economic duress does exist in English law (the majority rejected academic commentary suggesting the contrary), this doctrine is, as stated by Lord Burrows, “in its infancy”. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 11:33 am
Lord Mustill in Powell and English stated that where D and P embark on a criminal venture in which P goes further than D wishes, but foreseeably so, D has a measure of culpability for P’s act and V’s resulting death but usually at a lower level than P, D is guilty of murder. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 12:22 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 2:06 pm
16th Century English philosopher and statesman Francis Bacon once said " The ill and unfit choice of words wonderfully obstructs the understanding". [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 5:56 am
In Rahmatullah v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:51 pm
Among other trade secrets at issue in the lawsuit is the recipe for Thomas’ English Muffins, which were estimated to account for approximately $500 million in Bimbo’s annual sales income. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 5:19 am
Ltd. v Shanghai Yingxun Technology Co. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 5:19 am
Ltd. v Shanghai Yingxun Technology Co. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 10:00 am
This divergence was well-established by the revolution, and helps to explain why the federal 1800 Bankruptcy Act, which was heavily reflective of English bankruptcy practice, was so ill-received. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 2:41 am
That warning label, issued in both English and Spanish, stated the product was extremely flammable and should be kept away from heat/ sparks/ flame and should only be used with adequate ventilation. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 3:48 pm
This is like the Times's reporting on Cohen v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 12:41 pm
The Panel stated that the obligation to pay compensation can never be seen as an impairment of the freedom of movement. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:48 am
As the Supreme Court of Canada rightly stated in Hill v. [read post]
