Search for: "State v. German" Results 1541 - 1560 of 3,001
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2008, 10:01 am
Best points: German, well-educated, honest, organized and a hard-working lot. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 5:02 am by Michaela Ring (Hoffmann Eitle)
Urt. v. 2.6.2022 – 6 U 40/22, GRUR-RS 2022, 22858   The trade mark owner claimed that his trade mark rights had been infringed, and he applied for injunctive remedies. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Gibson) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 5 Dec 2017. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 4:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
Rather, inspired by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., the United States presently embraces them by willfully ignoring how Holmes punished Porfirio Díaz’s leading critic Eugene V. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 5:52 am
The case is Gintec International Import-Export GmbH v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:12 am
 In 'Zervos v Picasso, or copyright v droit d'auteur' , GuestKat Antonella Gentile offers a post on the decision in Zervos v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 2:50 am
A competitor, German-based Products 4U, made and sold, inter alia, accessories forWintersteiger's tools. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:56 am by Marty Lederman
With Monday’s filing of the reply briefs by the government and the intervenors, the briefing in the DAPA case, United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:24 am
German case law has shown this to to be the case in litigation over cantilevered chairs such as that illustrated on the left,  In the Netherlands too, the scope of protection of the TRIPP TRAPP chair appears to have been whittled down over time. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of David v Gabriel [2016] EWHC 2799 (QB)) -although, somewhat curiously, the judgment states it was handed down on 1 November 2016. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Independent claim 1 of each of the higher ranking auxiliary requests III to V contains fewer features and has a broader scope than that of auxiliary request VI.X. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Independent claim 1 of each of the higher ranking auxiliary requests III to V contains fewer features and has a broader scope than that of auxiliary request VI.X. [read post]