Search for: "State v. High"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 32,074
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2022, 12:24 pm
As we’ve previously reported, the fight against “big tech” remains a high priority for State Attorneys General on both sides of the aisle. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit decided in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
This blog extensively covered United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:03 am
On Thursday 1 July 2021, the High Court handed down judgment in the long-running libel action of Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Others [2021] EWHC 1797 (QB). [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 6:44 pm
In County of Los Angeles v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:23 am
Attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a Motion in Limine in the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:23 am
Attorney for the Southern District of New York filed a Motion in Limine in the case of United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:15 pm
(high interest, short term loans, Indian Commerce Clause)* United States Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2014dct.htmlKeepseagle v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 12:22 pm
[King v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 2:01 pm
In A.H. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 8:39 am
Similarly, the Washington Post series on the sorry state of funding for indigent defense in Virginia noted the high level of appeals in criminal cases that are dismissed on procedural grounds. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 9:20 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:06 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) AAO v Entry Clearance Officer [2011] EWCA Civ 840 (22 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Jackson v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 1870 (22 July 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office v Johnson [2011] EWHC 1950 (Admin) (25 July 2011) Secretary of State for the Home Department v CB & Anor (Rev 1) [2011] EWHC 1990 (Admin) (25 July 2011) Britannia Assets (UK) Ltd… [read post]
12 May 2015, 7:39 am
Stumpf, State v. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 4:41 am
However the Secretary of State argued that art 22 of the directive was not mandatory and the claim was dismissed by the High Court and Court of Appeal. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:18 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
March 12, 2019) Comphy makes high-end linens. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 2:35 pm
United States and Stuart v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Firstly, the authorities are unclear on what percentage of the population has to be at risk before a country is removed from the white list (in R (Husan) v SSHD [2005] EWHC 189 Admin 1% of the population was considered ‘significant’, yet in Singh v SSHD & Anor [2001] EWHC 925 (Admin), 0.76% of the population was not). [read post]
12 May 2023, 8:55 am
To my knowledge, however, no work examines whether state high courts have polarized or to what extent. [read post]
