Search for: "State v. Jacobs"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 1,970
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2011, 9:37 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 8:21 am
The Supreme Court recently delivered judgment in the case of Patmalniece (FC) v SoS for Work and Pensions. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 2:45 pm
The next February, Griffin v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 4:53 am
Jacob Dean counsel for the police sought to strike out the proceedings as an abuse of process under the Jameel jurisdiction, and that the allegations complained of are not defamatory and or a subject to qualified privilege. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:40 am
On #1, it was held by the Court of Appeal that the result of that decision was not to confer extra-EU jurisdiction, but merely to uphold judicial co-operation between European member states’ courts. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 8:40 am
Bullcoming v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 4:29 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:02 am
”Commenting on these points, Jacob LJ stated (at [36]) that while it “did not form any part of the Judge’s reasoning when he came to claim construction. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:04 pm
By embracing both Wong Kim Ark and Elk v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
” The Washington Post reports that in the wake of District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 12:58 pm
City of New London and in state cases such as Goldstein v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
The stockholder in VeriFone had brought derivative litigation in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 11:35 am
Corp. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:20 am
What about the state false arrest claim? [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
The Court also filled out its March 3 argument calendar by re-setting some previously granted cases: Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:06 am
This morning the Court of Appeal (Jacob and Sedley LJJ and Norris J) handed down its judgment in Nokia v IPCom [2011] EWCA Civ 6.By way of back story: IPCom (described in the judgment as a “non practising entity”, i.e. a patentee with no business of its own in products covered by the patents), owned a number of patents (which it had bought from Bosch) in the field of mobile communications technology. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:29 pm
This week, my colleague, Jeanne Fromer, and myself had the pleasure of hosting a Tri-State conference on Intellectual Property at Fordham Law School. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
" Washington Square Financial, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
See [Jacob A. [read post]
