Search for: "State v. Means"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 61,174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
The state court case was removed to federal court on diversity grounds and the Second Circuit had to determine whether Trump's allegedly defamatory comments were made within the scope of his employment as President of the United States.The case is Carroll v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 8:56 am
Aguiniga v. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 5:29 pm
”[1] Which pretty succinctly states the main point of this entire series of blog posts: that human agency matters. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
Gender Inequality in 21st Century Britain: Using litigation as a tool Direct Sex Discrimination and Disadvantage to women: R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40 Introduction: Does Law Have a Gender? [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:36 am
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 2:21 pm
State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 2:21 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:51 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:50 am
Bill C-75: What Does It Mean in Effect? [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 3:23 pm
Specifically, they stated that their plan was a private plan under a test set out in Alley v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 8:13 pm
§ 1500’s jurisdictional bar and deviated from settled precedent when it construed this Court’s straightforward “substantially the same operative facts” standard, United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
” The Obligation of State Parties to the Genocide Convention to Prevent Atrocities The International Court of Justice ruled in February 2007 in the case Bosnia and Herzegovina v. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:54 am
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 2:11 pm
So what will that mean in Wisconsin? [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:30 am
There is some case law, such as Mondev v United States, to support the theory that the standard may be an evolving one. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:00 am
In addition to evoking memories of a time when congressional relief for unauthorized migrants was more possible, United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 9:48 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:20 am
I previously wrote that I was hoping the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Reed Elsevier Inc. v. [read post]
