Search for: "State v. Olds"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 20,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2019, 2:57 am
This appeal considered whether the application of the revised benefit cap, introduced by the Welfare Reform and Work Act 2016, s 8, to lone parents with children under two years old (i) unlawfully discriminates against parents and/or the children, contrary to ECHR, art 14 with art 8, and/or art 2 of the First Protocol and in breach of the UK’s international obligations under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, art 3, and/or (ii) is irrelevant. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:02 am
Under the old standard Judge Meyers could be forgiven for allowing such possibilities enter his mental calculus. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 12:14 pm
Ruling in State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 5:34 am
Blake, 29 S.W.3d 26 (Tenn. 2000) and Carroll v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 3:00 pm
By Eric Goldman United States v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 8:00 am
This precedent did not hold for New York State bakers in Lochner v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:12 am
So I was reading an old Posner opinion (Burdett v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
Plaintiff was a passenger in a vehicle driven by a 19-year-old friend. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 4:54 am
Sixty years ago in June, the Sweatt v. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 9:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Runyon v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 4:09 pm
State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 2:30 am
Rountree v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:00 am
Civish, 382 F.3d 969, 973 (9th Cir. 2004) (failure to state a claim and Eleventh Amendment immunity); Olsen v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:18 pm
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Compulife Software, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 4:59 pm
But not 71-year-old Samuel Williams. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:07 pm
A new blog format.Everything old is new again. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
It certainly offends Article 6 ECHR, and the Convention has been regarded as part of the English and a European ordre public (Loizidou v Turkey (Article 50), para 48; In re J [2005] UKHL 40, [2006] 1 AC 80, para 44); the Convention is also, in any event, based also on age-old rules of English law (cf. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:35 am
As well as throughout the state. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 5:01 pm
Even though even the state says that Mr. [read post]
