Search for: "State v. Townes"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 5,890
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2019, 11:28 am
During yesterday’s argument in Knick v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 8:05 am
In the Matter of deBordenave v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 6:46 am
This judge-made rule ensures the courthouse will not be as tall as the Empire State Building.The case is Ogunkoya v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:58 am
” Chinese companies did not lose interest in the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
California State Lands Commission (2018) 24 Cal.App.5th 476. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 12:20 pm
LegalForce RAPC Worldwide P.C. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 8:00 am
Apkan v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Corp. v Fitzgerald, 49 AD3d 747. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Corp. v Fitzgerald, 49 AD3d 747. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 3:05 am
Supreme Court declined to join in San Antonio v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:46 am
” * AP: Google tracks your movements, like it or not * State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Stevens v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Stevens v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
Paul and Virginia v. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_08481.htmClick here to Read a FREE excerpt from A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty Under the Circumstances with respect to public employees in New York State. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176].The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_08481.htmClick here to Read a FREE excerpt from A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty Under the Circumstances with respect to public employees in New York State. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized… [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 10:27 am
No. 3 Ltd. v. [read post]