Search for: "Stock v. Stock"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 8,836
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2014, 6:06 am
., et al. v Erica P. [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 9:14 am
” Samma v. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 11:15 am
Jardine v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 2:13 am
US v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 6:12 pm
V. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
And, again, if the stock's not a complete sham, the former isn't zero. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
Jain v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 5:57 am
In this case, the panel said, it was clear that the defendants became irrevocably liable to deliver shares in Boston, Massachusetts (SEC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:25 am
As a part of the prohibitions under Article 9(3)(b), a third-party is prevented from offering trademark protected goods, putting them on the market or stocking them. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 6:34 am
The court also upheld the lower court’s finding that the attorney was liable for aiding and abetting violations of Section 10 and Rule 10b-5 (SEC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 1:25 am
As a part of the prohibitions under Article 9(3)(b), a third-party is prevented from offering trademark protected goods, putting them on the market or stocking them. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:54 am
The court permanently enjoined the defendant from further violations and ordered payment of nearly $650,000 in disgorgement and penalties (SEC v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:34 am
Shareholders of the ODP Corporation approved an equity compensation plan in 2019 that authorizes a grant of awards of performance shares, performance units, restricted stock, restricted stock units, nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, and other forms of equity-based compensation to officers, employees, non-employee directors, and consultants by the company's board. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
The plaintiffs claim that the company issued misleading statements about Kodak’s prospects that inflated the stock’s value, and that they suffered losses when the share price subsequently fell after the misrepresentations became known to the market (Tang v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
Matter of El-Roh Realty Corp., 48 AD3d 1190, 1191-92 (4th Dept 2008); Hesek v. 245 Fourth Main St., Inc., 170 AD2d 956 (4th Dept [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 4:24 am
However, in Steneken v. [read post]
8 May 2021, 5:08 am
., advertise, offer, stock and ship goods carrying a sign identical or similar to a registered sign? [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 12:44 pm
MacKenzie v. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 8:38 pm
In Seinfeld v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 10:43 pm
" Overwaitea Food Group Limited Partnership v. [read post]
