Search for: "US Constitution Petition" Results 1541 - 1560 of 12,697
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2010, 8:39 pm by Michael Ginsborg
Same-sex marriage supporters also turned out in force Tuesday and promised to deliver 18,000 petition postcards to legislators asking them to reject a constitutional amendment to deny protections to gay and lesbian families, said One Iowa Executive Director Carolyn Jenison. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:23 pm
  The Fifth Amendment[2] of the Constitution states “… nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 5:18 am by James Romoser
We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice or any contractual obligations. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
The information is general in nature and does not constitute legal advice or any contractual obligations. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:54 pm by Eric Caligiuri
GREENE’S ENERGY GROUP, LLC that inter partes review does not violate Article III or the Seventh Amendment of the Constitution. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 5:02 am by jonathanturley
She specifically rejected the claim that Roe constitutes “super precedent. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:08 am by V.D.RAO
Earlier, there used to be much emphasis on technical issues under section 397/398 of the Companies Act, 1956 rather the object of the provision. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm by Lawrence Solum
The petitions and public reaction to them tell a complex story about constitutional interpretation, judicial process, federalism and national identity, on the one hand, and race, gender, marriage and family, on the other. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 4:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a 30-page opinion originally filed July 3, and certified for publication on July 18, 2019, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s judgment denying a writ petition challenging, on zoning law and CEQA grounds, the City of Sacramento’s approval of a high-rise infill housing project in its midtown area. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 8:30 am
DPS Conclusion Based on our evaluation... we conclude that the petition and information readily available to us do present substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the U.S. population of coaster brook trout may be discrete and significant within the meaning of our DPS policy, and therefore may constitute a DPS. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:00 am by Micheal Sanchez
The forced sale remedy is limited to cases of real property that is not otherwise exempt from forced sale under the Texas constitution or other state laws and is received by inheritance, under a will, by joint tenancy with a right of survivorship, or by any other survivorship agreement. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:00 am by Micheal Sanchez
The forced sale remedy is limited to cases of real property that is not otherwise exempt from forced sale under the Texas constitution or other state laws and is received by inheritance, under a will, by joint tenancy with a right of survivorship, or by any other survivorship agreement. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 5:00 am by Micheal Sanchez
The forced sale remedy is limited to cases of real property that is not otherwise exempt from forced sale under the Texas constitution or other state laws and is received by inheritance, under a will, by joint tenancy with a right of survivorship, or by any other survivorship agreement. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 10:34 am by David Kopel
Finally, I like to show students how to use one part of the Constitution to help understand another part. [read post]
2 May 2009, 3:09 am
The main reason for this is that the other party has due process rights under the Constitution, and he or she is entitled to adequate notice of the allegations. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 11:05 am
Regardless, it was accepted, and many divorces were "fast tracked" using this cause. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:02 am by John Jascob
The Democratic leadership has criticized this move, arguing that it is too hazardous to hold hearings until the outbreak is "fully behind us. [read post]