Search for: "United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit" Results 1541 - 1560 of 10,923
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2020, 2:31 am by SHG
Most people, understandably, see the Supreme Court of the United States as the court of last resort. [read post]
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1]  The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1]  The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
On June 2, 2017 the Louisiana Second Circuit Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court’s judgment cancelling a mineral lease under Mineral Code article 140 and provided further clarity on a production in paying quantities analysis under Louisiana Mineral Code article 124.[1]  The dispute in Gloria’s Ranch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:08 pm
Mar. 1, 2012), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that, for purposes of applying the federal securities laws to transactions involving securities not traded on a U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:13 am by admin
The Court analyzed Section 101 of the United States Copyright in making its decision. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 10:58 am
Mar. 15, 2012), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit essentially approved the terms of a settlement between the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. [read post]
” Here, the district court concluded that [Trump] did not show that the United States acted in callous disregard of his constitutional rights. . . . [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:50 pm by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, which is scheduled to hear oral argument in the case next month. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The complainant [Plaintiff] in this Title VII action appealed the decision of a United States District Court to grant the Employer and several named employees of the Employer [Defendants'] motions for summary judgment on all of Plaintiff’s claims. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The complainant [Plaintiff] in this Title VII action appealed the decision of a United States District Court to grant the Employer and several named employees of the Employer [Defendants'] motions for summary judgment on all of Plaintiff’s claims. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
 The Supreme Court ruled that  in accord with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, that §630(b)’s two-sentence delineation, and the expression “also means” at the start of the second sentence, combine to establish separate categories: persons engaged in an industry affecting commerce with 20 or more employees but with respect to a states or a political subdivision of a… [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 11:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
 The Supreme Court ruled that  in accord with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, that §630(b)’s two-sentence delineation, and the expression “also means” at the start of the second sentence, combine to establish separate categories: persons engaged in an industry affecting commerce with 20 or more employees but with respect to a states or a political subdivision of a… [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 2:11 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-6262 Issue: Whether, under the Supreme Court’s opinions in United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 12:51 pm by Rohini Kurup
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit The plaintiffs appealed the district court’s dismissal of their claims. [read post]