Search for: "United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit" Results 1541 - 1560 of 7,492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2020, 7:15 am by Eric Goldman
Third, why are state AGs needed to help enforce the federal civil law newly exposed by Section 230? [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 5:08 am by Eugene Volokh
Another held the same about a statement that Muslims are disproportionately likely to be terrorists, and that terrorists are generally Muslims.[1] This, though, seems inconsistent with the statutory language, which speaks of "political opinions" and "political rights and privileges guaranteed to every citizen by the Constitution and laws of the United States or by the Constitution and laws of this State. [read post]
The Ninth Circuit held that the district court erred in denying the State’s renewed JMOL because plaintiff’s evidence did not establish a taking under Lucas or Penn Central. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 8:32 am by J. Alexander Lawrence and Lily Smith
Foreign websites that use geotargeted advertising may be subject to personal jurisdiction in the United States, even if they have no physical presence in the United States and do not specifically target their services to the United States, according to a new ruling from the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. [read post]
Courts of Appeals for the First, Fourth, Third and Eighth Circuits have ruled that allegations of “an increased risk of identity theft” and even expenditure of funds to mitigate such risks after a data breach do not satisfy constitutional standing requirements in the absence of actual harm. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:07 pm by Jaclyn Kelley-Widmer
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decision that only invalidated DHS’s granting of benefits in a related program—forbearance, or deferral, was never found to be a legal problem. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 5:48 pm by Patricia Salkin
  On the landowner’s appeal, the circuit court found violations of state statutory requirements and state and federal requirements and vacated the reversion order. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm by Daphne Keller
But courts do the interpreting under the court order standard, so diversity of state laws is not the issue.) [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am by Phil Dixon
This post summaries published criminal and related decisions decided by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in June, 2020 [read post]
Case date: 26 June 2020 Case number: No. 19-1935 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 7:56 am by Joy Waltemath
The court decided that it lacked jurisdiction to review the arbitrator’s NLRA ruling, however, explaining that “[i]f a party is dissatisfied with an arbitrator’s decision and remedy on the § 8 claim, that party does not appeal to a United States District Court but moves the NLRB to reopen the deferred unfair labor practice charges so that the NLRB can consider the arbitrator’s findings and remedy. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 4:58 am by Dennis Crouch
Thomas writes the question as follow: Contrary to Congress’ directives and this Court’s guidance, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) fabricated legal theories to unfairly discriminate against software innovations. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 11:33 am by Ilya Somin
Today, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued a ruling denying en banc rehearing in New York v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
Op. at 2 (Thomas, J. dissenting) (noting Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals held the issue waived).Third: McGirt came to the Supreme Court on review of the Oklahoma Court of Appeals’ affirmance of denial of State post-conviction relief, and Murphy on review of the Tenth Circuit’s reversal of the district court’s denial of § 2254 relief. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm by Julia Solomon-Strauss
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled against Trump, holding that “presidential immunity does not bar the enforcement of a state grand jury subpoena directing a third party to produce non-privileged material,” and that the subpoena was not subject to a heightened need standard. [read post]