Search for: "United States Department of Justice Inc." Results 1541 - 1560 of 3,641
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
The Institute for Justice (one of the public interest law firms that I most respect) has filed a petition asking the Court to decide whether the Excessive Fines Clause is incorporated; the petition reports that two federal circuit courts and at least 14 state high courts say it is, and 3 state high courts and one intermediate court says it isn't. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 10:00 am
Here is the sixth installment of the new Center for Justice & Democracy overview of the civil justice system. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:07 am
Opinion below (10th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Docket: 08-1134 Title:  United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Jordan Brunner
In his remarks on the amendment, Hutchinson indicated that it was designed to address “the growing threat that the People’s Republic of China poses to the citizens of the United States. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 8:41 am by Sarah M Donnelly
Department of Justice AUSA, Criminal Division, District of South Dakota, Pierre, N.D. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:11 am by Tim K. Garrett and Maja Hartzell
In a recent decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a lateral job transfer can – in certain circumstances – be an illegal adverse action and support a claim for a lawsuit for unlawful discrimination. [read post]
24 May 2022, 10:54 am by Michael Lowe
Sentencing will be done pursuant to the United States Sentencing Guidelines propounded by the United States Sentencing Commission. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 2:45 pm by Rich Vetstein
Attorney Michaud is also a decorated member of the United States Army, having served on active duty intermittently for the last 30 years as a Lieutenant Colonel in the Judge Advocates General Corps. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
And the Department of Justice will then talk to the industry at large and see that Apple is rather isolated on this issue. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 9:20 am by David Gans
    In the early days of our nation, Chief Justice John Marshall—one of the greatest Chief Justices in American history—penned landmark rulings affirming the Constitution’s promise of access to courts, holding that the Constitution authorized the “judicial department” to “decide all cases of every description under the constitution or laws of the United States,” and imposed on the federal courts the… [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:07 am by Terry Hart
Nearly four years ago, the US Justice Department indicted Kim Dotcom (née Kim Schmidt)—along with six other individuals and two corporations—on a number of charges related to the operation of Megaupload and alleged “massive worldwide online piracy. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Moreno, Assistant Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division of the Department of Justice. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 2:03 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Motiva, which is partially owned by Shell, is a leading refiner, distributor and marketer of fuels in the Eastern and Gulf Coast regions of the United States. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-916, which involves a provision of the Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006 stating that contracting officers at the Department of Veterans Affairs “shall award” contracts on the basis of competition restricted to small businesses owned by veterans whenever there is a “reasonable expectation” that two or more such businesses will bid for the contract at “a fair and reasonable price… [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 10:36 am by Abbott & Kindermann
This issue came before the United States Supreme Court in the form of a submerged lands case from the State of Florida. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 10:08 am by Sheppard Mullin
Department of Justice and FTC will undoubtedly challenge more of them in wake of Actavis. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
Mesa: In this case, the justices will decide what standard courts should use to determine whether the Fourth Amendment applies outside the United States. [read post]