Search for: "United States v. Borders" Results 1541 - 1560 of 3,812
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
-Mexico border without proper documentation and argued that he should be awarded asylum because of two incidents in El Salvador that made him flee out of fear for his life. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:00 am
But now we come to Judge Robertson's most grievous error: Hamdan's lengthy detention beyond American borders but within the jurisdictional authority of the United States is historically unique. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 8:50 am by Kari Hong
People were permitted to enter the United States to wait for an immigration hearing. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:25 am
There are 4 government prosecutors manning the United States Attorney's office in Alpine, all of whom carry large caseloads resulting from this activity. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 11:41 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The most recent decision of this type was last Monday, United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:10 am by Simon Lester
-made vehicles meeting the requirement compared to Mexican-made vehicles imported under like circumstances into the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses Wednesday’s argument in Endrew F. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am by Bernard Bell
  Reducing Industrial Accidents Industrial accidents have long caused carnage in the United States.[2] Generally employers can enhance their employees’ safety in two distinct non-exclusive ways. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 4:38 am by SHG
The justices of the United States Supreme Court are at their best when united against a common foe. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 7:33 am by Michelle C. Laubin
Niehoff, et al. was decided and issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 25, 2011. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 9:06 am by Cortney Lollar
United States is the interpretation of a restitution statute applied in tens of thousands of criminal sentencing hearings each year. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:05 pm by Steve Delchin
“inactivity” distinction previously rejected by the Sixth Circuit under which the plaintiffs argued that Congress could not stretch its commerce clause authority to regulate intrastate inactivity or, in effect, mere “existence” within the borders of the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 8:51 am
It distinguished all the other roadblock cases, including United States v. [read post]