Search for: "United States v. Breyer" Results 1541 - 1560 of 3,533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2019, 10:00 am by Michelle Ghetti
This would be devastating to gun-related commerce throughout the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 5:58 pm by Aubrey Mandus
Boudreau On Tuesday, December 8, 2020, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument on the question of what type of dialing equipment qualifies as an “automatic telephone dialing system” (ATDS) under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 5:58 pm by Aubrey Mandus
Boudreau On Tuesday, December 8, 2020, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument on the question of what type of dialing equipment qualifies as an “automatic telephone dialing system” (ATDS) under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). [read post]
29 May 2014, 6:56 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
As Justice Breyer once wrote, "The physical security of the President of the United States has a special legal role to play in our constitutional system. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 11:09 am by Jack Chin
United States (U.S. 2013) cited it and two other scholarly articles to show that the historical evidence contradicted Apprendi v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices considered the scope of tribal fishing rights, comes from Miriam Seifter. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 2:27 pm by Lara Fowler
On the last possible decision day, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in Florida v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
Cases To Be Argued This Week Joan Biskupic of USA Today writes a very detailed and thorough article on United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:21 am by James Beck - Guest
  In Geier, but not in Williamson, the United States government had supported preemption on the ground that allowing the state-law claims would conflict with agency objectives. [read post]