Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 9,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2012, 6:44 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:44 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
Defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma pursuant to CAFA, 28 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Brotherhood of Railway Clerks (1984) and Lehnert v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 7:51 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:19 pm
Filburn, Lopez, and United States v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 10:11 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:16 pm
” The concurrence took aim at the Sixth Circuit precedent of United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 8:35 am
(Eugene Volokh) The panel in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
ABTO and MZTO were both United States' citizens. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:05 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 pm
Saada were in the United States, Ms. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 6:38 pm
United States (Bruce R. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:18 am
United States, 137 S. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:44 pm
Because no such requirement exists in Canada, plaintiffs may enjoy a juridical advantage by pursuing their defamation claims in Canada rather than in the United States. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 10:13 am
Miranda rights suffer another setback in the United States Supreme Court case of Berghuis v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 1:01 pm
Walden v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 1:05 pm
Petitioner sought attorney's fees of $497,612.50, taxable costs of $23,950.96, and non-taxable expenses in the amount of $55,450.46, under Title 42, United States Code, Section 11607(b) (3), The district court observed that under this section, the Court has "broad discretion" in determining the fees, expenses, and costs, unless respondent satisfies the burden to establish that an award would be "clearly inappropriate." [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:02 am
Plaintiff was also granted leave to file an amended complaint setting out a RLUIPA claim.In United States v. [read post]