Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 6,864
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 6:55 pm
” In United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Harris, Attorneys General, David S. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:29 pm
According to the New York Times, petitioners plan to seek review of the decision by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:00 pm
If that was the political calculation, then the circumstances surrounding it became much more complicated with the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights’ decision in Greens v United Kingdom at the end of last month. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
" The recording of the Supreme Court Historical Society’s commemoration of Juneteenth, a “conversation on the lynching of Ed Johnson in 1906 and United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:47 pm
David T. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
. — F.Supp.2d —-, 2007 WL 43747 (S.D.Ohio) United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:00 pm
Earlier today, Judge Messitte of the Maryland federal district court ruled that the "Emoluments Clause" case - the nicely-captioned DC & State of Maryland v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:55 am
Further, even if the judgment is not enforceable in the United States, it is enforceable in Ontario, and there is also value in the vindication of a defamation judgment regardless of the ability to collect damages. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 1:57 pm
Kerin, Appellate Counsel; David E. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am
Muskrat v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 6:17 am
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8, a recent cert. petition that asks the Court to decide whether states can protect the right of unions to picket on private property even when a business owner, the property owner, doesn’t want them there; the Justices are scheduled to consider the case at their June 6 Conference. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 5:57 am
(FFIC) was the first company in the United States to offer green building commercial insurance in 2006. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:45 am
Twenty five years ago yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued one if its most shameful opinions in recent history: McCleskey v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:04 am
LAKE v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:21 pm
David L. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
