Search for: "United States v. Englander"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 2,087
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
IP practice in Northern Island (SOLO Independent IP Practitioners) Scotland Court of Session tells Schuh to Shush: Schuh Limited v Shhh… Limited (IPKat) South Africa CIPC TM filings set for a record year (Afro-IP) Thailand Busy Asian patent examiners (IP Komodo) United Kingdom Provision potentially “toothless” and “not very well thought-out”: a less than ringing endorsement for s68 PA 1977 – EWCA judgment in… [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
IP practice in Northern Island (SOLO Independent IP Practitioners) Scotland Court of Session tells Schuh to Shush: Schuh Limited v Shhh… Limited (IPKat) South Africa CIPC TM filings set for a record year (Afro-IP) Thailand Busy Asian patent examiners (IP Komodo) United Kingdom Provision potentially “toothless” and “not very well thought-out”: a less than ringing endorsement for s68 PA 1977 – EWCA judgment in… [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm
United States, 1990 WL 124496, at *3 (9th Cir. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 10:41 am
The case, Schexnayder v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:49 pm
to be enforced within the United States. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 3:24 pm
RP appealed to the Court of Appeal in 2008, with the assistance of the pro bono unit of the Bar Council and with John Hemming MP and her brother, AP as McKenzie friends. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 10:09 am
” The court painstakingly traced the development of the public trust doctrine from the Roman Emperor Justinian, through the common law courts of England, to the United States in the nineteenth century. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
On the issue of justiciability of the claim based on infringement of United States copyright, the Court had this to say: "87. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 12:17 pm
The salvage caused damage to the coral reef nearby and the United States asserted a natural resource damage claim of over $15 million. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:48 am
But now, in the aforementioned Brown v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:48 am
But now, in the aforementioned Brown v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Learned counsel for the petitioner stated that prayer (a) which seeks overruling or setting aside of the judgment already passed in Mr X v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 5:08 am
The second is perhaps more difficult for some people to swallow: "Because the United States is a distinct sovereign, a defendant may in principle be subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States but not of any particular State. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:50 am
In case you're wondering why this topic has been chosen, it has been quite controversial in the United States and, in a recent judgment in Och-Ziff, Mr Justice Arnold considered that it was actually part of both EU and United Kingdom trade mark law. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
MITCHELL Farnham, Surrey, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate, c2009 HD2741 .C77463 2009 See Catalog Capital punishment IS THE DEATH PENALTY DYING? [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
MITCHELL Farnham, Surrey, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate, c2009 HD2741 .C77463 2009 See Catalog Capital punishment IS THE DEATH PENALTY DYING? [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 3:00 pm
” United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
One legacy of these arrangements was Kay v Lambeth and Kay v UK, cases which have defined the application of human rights law to people losing their homes. [read post]
