Search for: "United States v. Guest"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 2,340
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2012, 1:20 am
Supreme Court's decision in Morrison v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:20 am
Supreme Court's decision in Morrison v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:36 pm
This year I shared a panel entitled “Theories of Health Reform in the United States” with three excellent speakers, including CoOp co-guest blogger David Orentlicher (Rights to Health Care in the United States: Inherently Unstable), Abby Moncrieff (Healthcare Federalism, Healthcare Rights, and the ACA), and Christina Ho (Recursivity and Health Reform in the US: An Application of Niklas Luhmann’s… [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Last year, he argued before the United States Supreme Court in the case of Davis v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 11:00 am
She is beginning to investigate the gendered aspects of the policies that encourage home ownership in the United States, thinking about how our policy choices in the area of housing have the effect of favoring men over women (just as they tend to benefit the wealthy over the non-wealthy, and whites over non-whites). [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:09 am
” And as Wikipedia explains, in the United States jurors are the trier of fact, i.e., they decide what, if any, elements of the charged crime has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:04 pm
He has been involved with the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (UN-COPUOS) since 2000, including as Second Vice-Chair and Rapporteur in 2004-06 of the committee bureau. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:50 pm
Guests: Brian Schweitzer: State of Montana, @brianschweitzer Rick Hasen: University of California, Irvine, @rickhasen Dave Levinthal: Politico, @davelevinthal Eugene Volokh: University of California, Los Angeles, @VolokhC Links: Schweitzer on ‘mining for influence in Montana’ (NY Times) Buckley v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
My thanks to Ted Folkman for inviting me to write a guest post as a follow-up to the excellent Symposium recently hosted here at Letters Blogatory on forum non conveniens and enforcement of foreign judgments. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:45 am
Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:56 pm
United States, 655 F.3d 1124, 1132-34 (9th Cir. 2011)). [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am
Lawcast 203: Kristen Heimark – From serving on the USS Lexington to practising as a London lawyer Today I am talking to Kristen Heimark, a practising lawyer in London who started her working life serving with the United States Navy on the USS Lexington. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:19 am
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 10:49 am
Supreme Court decided Booker v. [read post]
19 May 2012, 6:00 am
Steve Vladeck’s comments added to this by pointing to a series of recently decided or argued cases on contractor liability, included the lesser noticed United States v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:49 pm
That distinguishes us from the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand which all have constitutional or rights charter requirements that proposed laws must be considered for their potential impact on free expression. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:09 am
United States, Korematsu v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 6:00 am
He also discussed the Third Circuit’s merits opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Trade Representative Issues 2012 Special 301 Report – This post discusses the Office of the United States Representative’s 2012 Special 301 Report, which focused on the state of intellectual property rights worldwide, identifies thirteen countries on a “Priority Watch List” and another 28 countries on the “Watch List,” all relating to deficiencies in intellectual property protection in these countries. [read post]
3 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Trade Representative Issues 2012 Special 301 Report – This post discusses the Office of the United States Representative’s 2012 Special 301 Report, which focused on the state of intellectual property rights worldwide, identifies thirteen countries on a “Priority Watch List” and another 28 countries on the “Watch List,” all relating to deficiencies in intellectual property protection in these countries. [read post]
