Search for: "United States v. Minnesota"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 1,827
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2010, 5:49 am
State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 3:48 pm
Note, however, that many states (including, for example, Minnesota) already prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, and many companies that do business in all fifty states already have internal policies prohibiting sexual orientation discrimination. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 6:00 am
United States, the court held that expert testimony is admissible when the technique or theory it is based on has gained "general acceptance" in the relevant scientific community. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:31 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) United States US General iSlate, iTablet, IP! [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:12 pm
It may have a bearing on what is shaping up as the first attempt in Congress to write a new law reacting to the Supreme Court's decision last week in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 9:40 am
Three years later, as we await the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Bilski v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:23 am
United Tech. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
GenOway v S.A. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 1:58 am
The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota recently granted an insurer’s motion for summary judgment based upon its finding that the underlying claims were excluded by the policy’s broadly worded Product Exclusion. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 6:12 am
United States, a "closely watched federal tax case involving the scope of the work-product doctrine. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:27 pm
United Parcel Service, Inc., 2009 WL 1258491, at *6-7 (C.D. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
UPDATE, Jan. 7: Today United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:31 pm
The Minnesota case United States ex rel. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
: Catnic Components Ltd & Anor v Hill and Smith Ltd (Spicy IP) United States US Patents BPAI rules for ex parte appeals: Request for comment and notice of roundtable (Patently-O) Bilski and Warsaw share insights (AwakenIP) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: False marking statute applies on a per article basis: Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co (GRAY On Claims) (EPLAW) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) You say tomato... [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 4:26 pm
United States (for a CT discussion see State v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:27 pm
HOSPITAL SETTLE FRAUD CASE FOR $3 MILLION, United States v. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 9:10 am
Drew, which considered whether Terms of Service violations trigger CFAA liability, and United States v. [read post]
