Search for: "United States v. Young"
Results 1541 - 1560
of 3,624
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2018, 5:51 am
Barnette].So far, so good: If the state compels an individual to actually say something that betrays her convictions--the classic case being the compulsion of the young Jehovah's Witness students in Barnette to attest their allegiance to the United States, contrary to their genuine beliefs--there's a First Amendment problem. [read post]
16 May 2011, 4:15 pm
Robert V. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:28 pm
Robert V. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 8:53 am
Second Lawsuit: Young v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:37 am
Why are these bright, young, but inexperienced,[vii] female lawyers special? [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
The Submitting Professors are affiliated with forty-seven universities around the United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 8:43 am
Young v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 4:46 am
It states defendants involved in such offenses `shall forfeit to the United States such person's interest in’ any visual depictions, proceeds obtained from such an offense, and `any property, real or personal, used or intended to be used to commit or promote the commission of such offense or any property traceable to such property. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:05 am
Ernst & Young LLP, 768 F.Supp.2d 547, 549 (S.D.N.Y.2011); Chen–Oster v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 2:07 pm
Schools that require their students to turn over their social media user names and/or content are acting as though they are based in China and not in the United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 11:41 am
" This article is related closely to a case in which the United States Supreme Court heard argument last fall. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 11:41 am
" This article is related closely to a case in which the United States Supreme Court heard argument last fall. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
Young, 13-95 (whether a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:02 pm
Adam Liptak of the New York Times has alerted me to an interesting decision issued yesterday by the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
So I was interested to see another case taking on this thorny issue in United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:52 am
Hayes v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 8:30 am
It’s 2017 and the United States still locks up immigrants for years without even a hearing. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 8:30 am
It’s 2017 and the United States still locks up immigrants for years without even a hearing. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Importantly, the Court’s discussion of the source-identifying function of trademarks, repeated emphasis on source confusion as the principal harm in trademark law (see, e.g., the type of confusion “most commonly in trademark law’s sights”, “the bête noire of trademark law”, and the “cardinal sin under the law”), and discussion of the United We Stand America opinion suggests the Justices may like Rogers’ focus on preventing uses… [read post]
