Search for: "WILSON v. THE STATE" Results 1541 - 1560 of 3,370
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
As was said in Salvesen v Riddell 2013 SC (UKSC) 236 (Lord Hope at para 57), if such an order is made, it may be appropriate to give permission to the Lord Advocate to return to the court for any further orders under section 102(2)(b) as may be required. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 7:17 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 120312, July 17, 2012) and permitted an inmate to proceed with this claim under RLUIPA that he is being required to undergo an annual TB test despite his protest that the injections violate his religious beliefs.In Wilson v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Gubeladze, heard 12-13 Mar 2019. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
On the same day, Johnson J heard the trial in the case of Shafi v New Vision TV Limited and another QB-2021-00443.6 On 4 to 8 December 2023 HHJ Parkes KC heard the trial in the case of Wilson v Mendelsohn and others QB-2021-002673. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 7:59 am by Eleanor Winslet
The Advocate General has given a preliminary opinion in the case of USDAW & Wilson v Woolworths and others (“the Woolworths case”) on the question of whether there is a requirement to aggregate the number of employees across different locations to meet the thresholds for collective consultation obligations (in England and Wales, of 20 employees in a 90-day period). [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 11:15 am by Kevin LaCroix
Jonathan is a Partner in the Wilson Elser law firm’s New York office. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 8:48 am by Gregory Forman
Three reported South Carolina cases state adultery must be proven by “clear and convincing evidence. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 5:05 am
State: The CCA granted the State's petition for discretionary review with oral argument in this Bexar County murder on the following issue:Did the Court of Appeals err in equating the use of deception in the creation of a document for interrogation purposes with a violation of Tex. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm by Blog Editorial
R (Quila & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (Bibi & Anor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 6:43 pm by John Floyd
More than eight decades earlier (1833) in United States v. [read post]