Search for: "Waters v. United States" Results 1541 - 1560 of 4,952
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
He reminds us that our favorite Supreme Court cases dealing with navigability -- United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:42 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd & Anor v United Utilities Water plc, heard 6-8 May 2014. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the government must obtain a warrant for historical records showing where a cell phone connects with towers. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 11:20 am by Ryan Goellner
The Sixth Circuit first laid out the law on the discretionary exception function, as defined by the Supreme Court in 1991 in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 10:15 am by Sam Cohen, Alex Vivona
The United States has repeatedly reaffirmed that the archipelago falls within its mutual defense treaty with Japan. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Sri Medicherla
Environmental Protection Agency announced a final rule that revised the definition of “waters of the United States,” limiting the agency’s authority to address water pollution. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Resolving the issue of whether the plaintiff is entitled to retirement health benefits "requires examination of the relevant . . . plan documents" (Matter of Parrino v Albertson Water Dist., 118 AD3d 802, 802; see Matter of Consolidated Mut. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Resolving the issue of whether the plaintiff is entitled to retirement health benefits "requires examination of the relevant . . . plan documents" (Matter of Parrino v Albertson Water Dist., 118 AD3d 802, 802; see Matter of Consolidated Mut. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:22 pm by Leland E. Beck
Northwest Environmental Defense Center, argued this morning in the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:33 pm by azatty
In fact, they got to go to the big show—as a defendant at the United States Supreme Court (Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 12:27 pm by Buce
  Frum may not have noticed that he is a tapping into a classic episode in United States Constitutional history. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 11:28 am by Chuck Becker
 (Note: While I certainly hope that EPA is correct in saying that it has no impact, the United States Supreme Court might disagree with that assessment as it did in last term’s case of Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
EPA Clean Water Rule: WOTUS Field Hearing #2: Impacts of the Proposed Waters of the United States Rule on State and Local Governments and Stakeholders Field Hearing #1: Impacts of the Proposed Waters of the United States Rule on State and Local Governments and Stakeholders <> Nation's first federal… [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:47 am by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Mar. 26 in the battle over access to a drug used in medication abortions, which account for over half of all abortions performed in the United States. [read post]