Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 1,882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
’ ([2001] 2 AC 127, at 206 per Lord Nicholls). [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:56 pm
After all, as he House of Lords observed in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms [2000] 2 AC 115, freedom of expression is a right without “an effective rule of law is not possible”. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm
After all, as he House of Lords observed in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms [2000] 2 AC 115, freedom of expression is a right without “an effective rule of law is not possible”. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
Although the litigation failed to stop the book, it did develop the law of confidentiality and aid the development of the protection of privacy, even before the Human Rights Act (see Attorney General v Observer [1990] 1 AC 109). [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 12:56 am
Plaintiffs suing for defamation seek to protect their reputation – what other people think of them, as Lord Denning (pic) defined it in Plato Films Ltd v Speidel [1961] AC 1090. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:55 am
In Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Limited (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109 Lord Keith stated that “the right to personal privacy is clearly one in which the law in this field should seek to protect. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 3:33 am
Background Tungsten is one of three lawsuits among the equity stakeholders in a Delaware LLC known as Ace Group International (“AGI”) that owns the rights and intellectual property of the Ace hospitality brand of hotels, following the death in 2013 of its founding majority member, Alexander Calderwood. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 3:33 am
Background Tungsten is one of three lawsuits among the equity stakeholders in a Delaware LLC known as Ace Group International (“AGI”) that owns the rights and intellectual property of the Ace hospitality brand of hotels, following the death in 2013 of its founding majority member, Alexander Calderwood. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
’ ([2001] 1 AC 127, 201 per Lord Nicholls.) [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:46 am
He also referred to various passages from case law including Lord Diplock’s observations in Fothergill v Monarch Airlines Ltd [1981] AC 251, 279: “Elementary justice or, to use the concept often cited by the European Court [of Justice], the need for legal certainty demands that the rules by which the citizen is to be bound should be ascertainable by him (or, more realistically, by a competent lawyer advising him) by reference to identifiable sources that are publicly… [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm
United States On 31 January 2022, the EARN IT Act was reintroduced to the Senate by Senator Richard Blumenthal and 18 co-sponsors from both parties. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 11:45 am
(Spiliada Maritime Corpn v Cansulex Ltd (The Spiliada) [1987] AC 460) It has been argued that if the Australian “clearly inappropriate forum” test for forum non conveniens is adopted, (Voth v Manildra Flour Mills Pty Ltd (1991) 65 A.L.J.R. 83 (HC); Regie National des Usines Renault SA v Zhang [2002] HCA 10 (HC)) it is unlikely that a foreign claimant seeking compensation from a parent company in an English court would see… [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 4:01 am
Ltd. v Diaconicolas & Capsopolus, the court stated that regardless of how ‘novel, original or striking’ the colour scheme may be, it was not a feature that was relied upon by the ordinary purchaser to identify the source of the product. [read post]
9 May 2014, 3:59 am
A statement of the principle was set out in the case of Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 4:39 am
” Briefly: At ACS, Ajmel Quereshi discusses Bank of America Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 5:39 pm
Well into his stride Tugendhat stated that “no case of public interest had been advanced before herself. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in State of Haryana v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Secondly, the court considered that, while no previous case has directly answered the question raised by the appeal, the cases of Bulman & Dickson v Fenwick & Co [1894] 1 QB 179 and Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1963] AC 691 provided strong implicit support for MUR’s case. [read post]
