Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 1,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2010, 2:39 am
Nevertheless, the “single meaning” rule has been well established in the law for two hundred years and was endorsed by the House of Lords in Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:03 am
Well, they did; in State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:34 am
Harrell v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 3:04 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Secretary of State for the Home Department v HK (Turkey) [2010] EWCA Civ 583 (27th May 2010) Haugesund Kommune & Anor v Depfa ACS Bank [2010] EWCA Civ 579 (27 May 2010) Varsani v Relfo Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 560 (27 May 2010) Egal, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 584 (27 May 2010) Kookmin Bank v Rainy Sky SA & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 582… [read post]
27 May 2010, 12:57 am
AC v Berkshire West Primary Care Trust [2010] EWHC 1162 (Admin) (25 May 2010) – Read Judgment An NHS Trust acted rationally in refusing to provide breast enlargement surgery to a transsexual, the High Court has ruled, even though there was credible medical evidence that the surgery would have been beneficial. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:16 pm
The power to detain under the 1971 Immigration Act had to be strictly construed, and should be compliant with the principles laid down in Hardial Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704, as extrapolated in Tan Te Lam v Superintendent of Tai A Chau Detention Centre (1997) AC 97 PC (HK). [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:44 pm
” Saxe, 240 F.3d at 204; see also United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 3:09 am
Ethicon Limited [1975] AC 396). [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:58 am
The LA decided that she lacked capacity to make such an application, R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Begum [1993] 1 AC 509. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:58 am
The LA decided that she lacked capacity to make such an application, R v Tower Hamlets LBC ex p Begum [1993] 1 AC 509. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:27 am
(At ACS blog, Jeffrey Clements disputes Citizens United’s criticism of the Kagan nomination.) [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm
Richard Fentiman is Reader in Private International Law at the University of Cambridge, where he teaches the postgraduate course on International Commercial Litigation. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:06 pm
However, the House of Lords has made it clear that there is no tort of invasion of privacy ( see Wainwright v Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406, Campbell v MGN [2004] 2AC 457, and the Court of Appeal in McKennitt v Ash) . [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:59 pm
CIVIL RIGHTS, LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW Zakrzewska v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:47 am
Asiatic Petroleum, [1915] AC 705, it clearly emerged through a trilogy of cases in 1944. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:40 am
Based on Justice Scalia’s questions in last week’s argument in Doe v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
There was no infringement of her existing rights (Wandsworth v Winder [1985] AC 461) as the right was to an AST, not an assured tenancy. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
There was no infringement of her existing rights (Wandsworth v Winder [1985] AC 461) as the right was to an AST, not an assured tenancy. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm
R (D and M) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; R (EM) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 18 Read judgment With apologies, this post originally appeared with the wrong title The Court of Appeal has ruled on two linked challenges to the entitlement to welfare benefits of prisoners detained in psychiatric hospitals. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:13 am
Classification of a covenant, therefore, can be outcome-determinative in a state like Georgia.The Court of Appeals agreed with ACS, finding that although the covenant was contained in an employment agreement, it was a condition precedent to the stock purchase agreement between Boyce and the majority shareholder. [read post]
