Search for: "Adams v. New York"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 2,515
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2012, 8:07 am
Ryan, good guest blogging on the subject at Sentencing Law & Policy, as well as Adam Liptak's coverage in the New York Times and notable commentary at the ABA Journal, the Courthouse News Service, and the Habeas Book Blog. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 3:38 am
The New York Times' Adam Liptak has an interesting "Sidebar" column on a case raising the question of whether a court's decision to allow a witness to testify over Zoom violated a criminal defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:26 pm
According to the Fourth Department in People v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 4:32 pm
No luck for the Englishman in New York, as the selfie was declared unprotectable by a US court because it was shot by a non-human [see here, here and here for previous posts on this case]. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 2:12 pm
City of New York do not appear to be nearly as severe as those in any of these cases): Lopez v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 8:46 am
Adam Liptak of the New York Times and Robert Barnes of the Washington Post expanded their coverage for the Saturday editions, while Warren Richey of the Christian Science Monitor added his. [read post]
22 May 2019, 8:14 am
The White House is considering restricting Chinese video surveillance giant Hikvision’s ability to buy American technology, says the New York Times. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU Docket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAUDocket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that the court “adopted a strict interpretation of a federal immigration law, saying it required the detention of immigrants facing deportation without the possibility of bail if they had committed crimes, including minor ones, no matter how long ago they had been released from criminal custody. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 10:19 am
The New York Times’ Matt Apuzzo and Adam Goldman detailed the CIA’s hunt for moles in China in an extensive feature. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 6:18 am
The Episcopal Church, et al., in the Adams County Circuit Court. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:45 am
Jacobs of Greenwire, who suggested that the Court “appeared to search . . . for a middle ground,” and from Adam Liptak of The New York Times, who observed that, “[e]ven as the justices differed on the scope of the agency’s authority, . . . they seemed to agree that the case before them was not particularly significant. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:17 am
” Adam Liptak of The New York Times reports on the dispute between the Illinois attorney general and governor, describing it as “just one salvo in the white-hot war over the fate of public unions, which hangs in the balance. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:01 am
The Atlantic Wire and Reason also report on this “anger” and “fury,” while Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View, Laurence Tribe at PBS, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, William McGurn of the Wall Street Journal, Ilya Shapiro of Cato@Liberty, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, and Mark Sherman of the Associated Press all discuss the Chief Justice’s vote. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 9:49 pm
Also honored is Judge Richard Posner, Chief Judge of the New York State Court of Appeals Judith Kaye, former Solicitor General Seth Waxman, and Yale Law School Dean Harold Koh. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 3:56 am
Khaira v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 11:34 am
Fitzsimmons helped found the Bank of North America and the Insurance Company of North America, and he also advised Hamilton on the creation of the Bank of New York. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am
In The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that “the justices ruled that the appeals court had used the wrong standard in sustaining a $4 million judgment against two Los Angeles County sheriff’s deputies,” but that the court suggested that “the award might be sustained on a different theory. [read post]
