Search for: "BES v. State"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 68,813
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
A few days after the Supreme Court decided New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:00 am
Recordings NJ is what’s called a “one-party consent” state when it comes to being able to record conversations with other people. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 8:49 am
In Szalai v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
We’d all been working for over a year on a contract that would make it possible, someday in the future, for everyone to have free and open access to all the official court decisions ever published in the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
This factor weighs in favor of the worker being an independent contractor when the work relationship is definite in duration, non-exclusive, project-based, or sporadic based on the worker being in business for themself and marketing their services or labor to multiple entities. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
United States, 306 F.2d 633, 637 (2d Cir. 1962) ; United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:07 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
For instance, the 1993 California case Johnson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:34 am
Penland v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:32 am
” Justice Borrok also found that “the terms of the alleged oral agreement are unenforceable because they are indefinite and incapable of being enforced” and that the “promissory estoppel claim fails because Mr. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:27 am
The case of Street v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:27 am
Gilman v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 10:34 am
There are rare patent cases that challenge the validity of the patent statutes or the way those statutes are applied by the PTO (e.g., Apple v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 10:31 am
Malta V, in Valetta from 24 to 27 September 2024. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:26 am
The notion of ‘substantial taking’ should not be intended in a quantitative sense (see as early as Designers Guild).In light of the CJEU decision in Infopaq (which, before being a case about originality, is a case about infringement and remains good law even in post-Brexit UK) it is apparent that there is “substantial taking” of a work when what is being reproduced is sufficiently original in the sense of being its author’s own intellectual… [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 7:59 am
The judgment of Justice Beach in Societe Civile et Agricole du Vieux Chateau Certan v Kreglinger (Australia) Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 248 found that there was no damage, and therefore passing off was not established. [read post]
The Supreme Court Cannot Ignore the National Security Implications of the So-Called ‘Jawboning’ Case
17 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Mary McCord is one of the counsel representing former superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services Maria Vullo in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm
After all, Missouri v. [read post]
