Search for: "Black v. Black" Results 1561 - 1580 of 12,677
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2011, 6:51 am by admin
  After refusing to withdraw the application, Defendants placed orders for T-Shirts with the “Terrible T-Shirt” design printed in black and gold. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:48 am
” Judge Black also quoted from an earlier Supreme Court opinion, in Powell v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 4:15 pm
  But that's the dissent.The majority says there isn't a genuine issue of material fact; the shadows didn't cause the accident, which was instead caused by a hit-and-run driver who was going between 50 and 70 miles per hour -- on Halloween evening, no less -- on a street that had trick-and-treaters dressed in all black and a posted speed limit of 25 mph when kids were present (and 45 mph otherwise).Just because you have an expert doesn't mean that you'll… [read post]
30 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Last Monday, the Supreme Court decided Foster v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 3:36 am by SHG
” The majority in Plessy v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm by Mark Graber
 The specter of Dunning School history haunted oral argument in Anderson v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:27 am by Cynthia Godsoe
I am in the middle of a new book by Angela Onwuachi-Willig, According to our Hearts: Rhinelander v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:48 pm
He showed her a black 2009 Dodge Charger with body damage and mileage of 107,000. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:01 am by Marcel Pemsel
Further, chevrons or V-shaped marks can be presented in multiple ways showing different characteristics, e.g. , , , . [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:29 am by Léon Dijkman
Even if this creates problems of its own – e.g. it may lead to the counterintuitive result that well-known names end up getting less protection, as happened in C-361/04 Picasso v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
  The first witnesses were Lords Black and Hunt, setting out their proposal for regulation without statutory intervention. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 3:36 pm
"    This is the very same nonsensical victim-blaming rhetoric  the Supreme Court used more than a hundred years ago in  Plessy v. [read post]