Search for: "Brown v. State"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 8,738
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am
Article 10: The right to receive information Mr Sugar argued that he had the right to disclosure of the Report under Article 10 ECHR which he said recent Strasbourg case law made clear recognised a right of access to information (referring specifically to Matky v Czech Republic, Tarsasag v Hungary and Kenedi v Hungary). [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In her January 31, 2014 decision in Morille-Hinds v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm
Finally, on Monday, the last day of the Term, the Court announced its opinion in Brown v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 10:04 am
" Anthony Brown v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Still no Brown v. [read post]
26 May 2008, 8:26 am
State v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:20 pm
State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlPhillip v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 9:27 am
Additional Resources: Espinoza v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
Brown and Biden v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:20 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 12:10 pm
Brown & Williamson or Alabama Realtors v. [read post]
5 May 2024, 11:09 am
In-custody transportation through the United States Marshals can take many weeks, with long bus rides during which defendants are shackled, and overnight stays are often in county jails and other contract facilities ill-equipped to address the needs of our incompetent clients.This week, however, the Sixth Circuit gave teeth to the statutory requirements of the Speedy Trial Act in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:16 am
State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 12:00 am
Browne v Dunn Rears Its Head Against this, the defendant’s case suffered from a tendency to attempt to produce inadmissible hearsay, and contravention of the ancient tripwire Browne v Dunn, a case from 1893 that requires litigants to put statements of fact to opposing witnesses in cross-examination if the litigant later intends to claim that the statement of fact contradicts the testimony of the opposing witness. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:16 pm
The week wraps up with continuing coverage of this week’s decisions in Brown v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 6:56 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:17 pm
Freezing the payment of salary increments does not freeze the crediting of service for the purpose of determining an employee's increment stepMatter of Meegan v Brown, 63 AD3d 1673In response to a State Comptroller's report concerning a fiscal crisis in the City of Buffalo, the State Legislature passed the Buffalo Fiscal Stability Authority Act on July 3, 2003. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 4:02 am
Freezing the payment of salary increments does not freeze the crediting of service for the purpose of determining an employee's increment stepMatter of Meegan v Brown, 63 AD3d 1673In response to a State Comptroller's report concerning a fiscal crisis in the City of Buffalo, the State Legislature passed the Buffalo Fiscal Stability Authority Act on July 3, 2003. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 1:15 pm
Humphrey; Tribal Political Dissident) Brown, et al. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 8:48 am
On December 1, 2015 the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
