Search for: "CO.1. Means" Results 1561 - 1580 of 16,768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2016, 3:02 pm by Rebecca Grevitt
As regards co-(re)insurance pools, the Commission considered the IBER to be of limited use and relevance. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 6:07 am
Merck & Co., 2003 WL 21658613, at *6 (Ohio App. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 7:46 am
Introductory Note )Throughout the week starting 20 June 2022, the co-editors will post written contributions on the homepage of the Symposium in the following order:--Monday: Introduction by co-editors Justine Batura (Twitter: @JustineBatura), Anna Sophia Tiedeke & Michael Riegner (Twitter: @riegnerm)--Monday, 1 pm: Giulia Botta--Tuesday, 8 am: Jonathan Klaaren (Twitter: @JonathanKlaaren)--Tuesday, 1 pm: Lucas Roorda (Twitter: @LRoordaLaw)--Wednesday, 8 am:… [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:13 pm by David Fagundes
  These charges are no joke—they could carry a penalty of up to 35 years in prison and fines of up to $1 million. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 7:45 am by Julian Bremner
  Unmarried mothers, if their partner is a man of means and income – can access support through Schedule 1 of the Children’s Act. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 2:28 am
     Claim 1 of the '611 patent recites: 1. [read post]
22 May 2012, 12:05 pm by NBlack
Penal Law s. 240.30(1) provides that a person is guilty of aggravated harassment in the second degree “when, with intent to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm another person, he or she: 1. [read post]
Unlike tangible assets, which can be protected primarily through physical means, intangible assets such as data require additional considerations. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 8:54 am
For doctors and nurses this means that they must act in a manner similar to a reasonable person with similar training and skills in that profession. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:10 am by Michael B. Stack
  Important considerations go beyond calling 9-1-1 or handing out a band-aid. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 12:19 pm
A tenancy in common essentially means that two or more people (the surviving spouse AND the blood relatives of the deceased) would co-own the homestead property. [read post]