Search for: "California v. United States" Results 1561 - 1580 of 12,562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2017, 3:18 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States, pre-empts state-law regulation of groundwater. [read post]
12 May 2022, 4:48 am
  California already bars anyone on a state payroll (including yours truly, who teaches at UC Berkeley) from getting reimbursed for travel to states that discriminate against LGBTQ+ people. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
” Peralta was ordered removed on June 7, 1999.Peralta returned regularly to the United States. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm
(“WildTangent”), in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:05 am by John E. Harding, JD, CFLS
A federal judge’s forceful opinion Wednesday in favor of same-sex marriage is only the beginning of a process that is likely to go all the way to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 4:28 pm
Copyright cases concerning alleged unlawful activities purposely directed toward the United States are more amenable to suit in the United States for the reasons set forth herein. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 5:41 pm by Sandy Levinson
How, if he becomes president, might the civil war begin, since there will certainly be no Fort Sumter to signal the beginning, and the California vote for secession apparently won't take place until 2019. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:41 am
A lengthy explanation of reasonable suspicion and suspected forged paper tags is United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 10:25 am by Jon Ibanez
The United States Supreme Court in Miranda v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm by Cicely Wilson
Perry, United States Supreme Court (6/26/13)United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 6:38 am by jonathanturley
Now Newsom has quietly signed the repeal of the law after it was headed for an almost certain rejection by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:52 pm by Kurt Opsahl
”  After its thorough analysis, the court declared “(1) that the Australian Injunction is repugnant to the United States Constitution and the laws of California and the Unites States; and (2) that the Australian injunction cannot be recognized or enforced in the United States. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 9:52 am by Nazareth M. Haysbert
Hayes, United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of California, granted final approval to a class action settlement against luxury fashion house Louis Vuitton. [read post]