Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 51,934
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2011, 5:07 pm
Criminal Law & Procedure, Sentencing The People v. [read post]
21 May 2008, 12:38 am
R v Bassett; [2008] WLR (D) 157 “For an offence of voyeurism to be committed, within the definition in s 67 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, there had to be a private act which involved parts of the body for which people would normally expect privacy, as defined by s 68(1). [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:36 am
Don't cross the line for no reason.In this case, as in many others, the defendant has been caught dead to rights. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 2:27 pm
Maybe transfer the case (or probation) to Florida? [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:43 pm
But I think it's a tough question how far the police are able to go when all they have on you is that you're carrying a personal amount of weed, which may well be -- and in the vast majority of case, is (I suspect) -- legal under California law. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 1:18 pm
So my guess is that the vehicle is actually worth less than the $500 that the defense postulates, since a car with 200,000 miles on it is worth a fair piece less than one with 100,000 miles on it.)The other funny thing about this case is the discrepancy between the resources devoted to the case in the trial court and the resources devoted to it on appeal. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 3:08 pm
If, after conducting the hearing, the juvenile court judge determines that Vela’s case should be transferred to a court of criminal jurisdiction, then his convictions and sentence will be reinstated. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 3:36 pm
EFF – “A Victory for Privacy and Transparency: HRW v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:07 pm
Particularly in a case about a bar fight.Were I the trial court, I'd have done the following. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:48 am
Last week in Skinner v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:50 am
That case, U.S. v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:50 am
(See Sam Issacharoff's recent paper on SSRN on this point.)Not only was Erie not particularly necessary to the New Deal Revolution, but the case it overruled, Swift v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:45 am
The post Flowers v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 1:30 pm
Today the Mississippi case of Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:57 am
The US Supreme Court granted certiorari Monday in Philadelphia v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:35 am
He asserts that the Court’s decades old third-party doctrine cases–Smith v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 10:01 am
’“ (People v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 6:10 pm
Alabama: In People First v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 6:07 am
Facts of the Case In the case of Delacerda v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
If yes, the law is little changed as a practical matter, and the same people will be convicted, by and large. [read post]
