Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 48,939
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2007, 2:31 pm
That, as here, would justify a "cost" award of around $200,000? [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
In Ponderosa Telephone Co. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 8:18 am
Law Lessons from SHELLEY MOEHRLE, n/k/a SHELLEY PRYSANT V. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 6:00 am
On December 23, 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered an important decision on copyright infringement in Cinar Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 9:55 am
: Snyder v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:29 am
v) Did the individual defendants failed to act in the best interests of their employer during the course of their employment? [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:54 am
In today’s costs judgment in MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 139 the Court of Appeal, applying the general rules on costs, declined to award costs to the defendants, which had ultimately prevailed on a question of obviousness, because they had raised so many issues on which they lost. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 6:42 am
The ruling, Kaymark v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 1:39 pm
Sojitz Energy Venture, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 8:56 am
Perez v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 8:06 am
District Court of the Eastern District of New York awarded interim attorneys’ fees and costs totaling $3,707,313.29 to Plaintiffs who intervened in the matter of United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:10 pm
ATK Thiokol, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 10:00 pm
In Phoenix Light SF Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 8:03 am
Dukes and Comcast v. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 6:45 pm
The recent decision of Byrne J in a security for costs application provides consideration of quantum for future litigation costs, including discovery. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:32 am
US Suquamish Indian Tribe v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:32 am
US Suquamish Indian Tribe v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 5:01 am
A recent Tax Court Case, Williams v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 2:26 pm
Cavender On January 25, the Texas Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in the case of Anadarko Petroleum Corp. and Anadarko E&P Co. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
This judgment, in many respects, follows the earlier decision of Haines v Sarner [2005] EWHC 90009 (Costs), in which Simon Gibbs acted for the Defendant. [read post]
