Search for: "Cross v. Cross" Results 1561 - 1580 of 21,842
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2007, 4:00 pm
Heller (07-290), and the respondent’s cross-petition contesting the finding that five plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the ban, Parker v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 9:15 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here are new materials in the case now captioned Nooksack Indian Tribe v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am by INFORRM
The Claimant cross appealed on “the fact of the relationship”, contending that publication of this should be restrained until trial or the determination of the factual disputes between the parties. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:16 am by SHG
We note, however, that such questions were improper (see People v Paul, 229 AD2d 932; People v Paul, 212 AD2d 1020, 1021, lv denied 85 NY2d 912; People v Edwards, 167 AD2d 864, lv denied 77 NY2d 877). [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:54 am by Simon Fodden
The Supreme Court of Canada has released its decision in Attorney General of Canada, et al. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 6:56 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
[t]he declarant testifies at trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is...consistent with declarant's testimony and is... [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 2:25 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
I have done several posts on this blog (here, here, here, here, and here) about the inaccuracy of regular and cross-racial eyewitness identifications and whether expert testimony about this inaccuracy should be allowed. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 5:15 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
[t]he declarant testifies at trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is...consistent with declarant's testimony and is... [read post]