Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 1561 - 1580 of 7,395
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2010, 9:43 pm by MacIsaac
  However, the witness’s factual narrative of the actions he took and the observations he made, including describing without interpretation, the anatomical features he observed in the x-rays does not amount to offering an opinion and does not offend the Rule. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:28 am
Thus, I read In re Sinex as saying that 20% more than X is outside the scope of substantially X. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 6:03 pm
They say that X is true, so you write that X is false. [read post]
19 Jul 2004, 7:01 am by Ed Sim
Folks, this story does not end here……….. [read post]
19 May 2009, 12:51 pm
Hence, culture is free to evolve and create new protocol that does not violate the grammar of the constitution. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 11:18 pm by Jeffrey Richardson
Those are just numbers, though ... what does it mean in real life? [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:41 pm by Heather Morse (Milligan)
What value does my client place on my knowledge of X? [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 10:06 pm by Florian Mueller
The FTC-DG COMP phone call that the article references undoubtedly took place; even the Capitol Forum does not dispute that fact. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 6:01 am by Florian Mueller
A couple of structural elements are clearly very different from a traditional sale.Section 3, Purchase Price, does not state any amount Unwired Planet had to pay upfront. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:23 am by charonqc
Below are extracts  from  what could well be the testimony  that Gordon Brown delivers to the Iraq Inquiry when he does appear…possibly? [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 5:49 am
Importantly, the increased risk does not justify the retention of a surgical sponge, gauze, or instrument. [read post]
20 May 2008, 5:50 pm
" IFF probably also realized where the shipment came from when it removed the original shipping and packing labels and documents, but I suppose that’s just piling on. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 1:23 pm
Essentially they mean that X event (such as the transfer of an asset) occurs when Y conditions are met. [read post]
4 May 2017, 5:45 pm by Sandy Levinson
  That is, instead of asking, in the manner of many law school classrooms, does Congress have the abstract power to pass X or Y? [read post]