Search for: "Doe 35" Results 1561 - 1580 of 17,228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Under section 35(1) of the IRPA, there are five broad bases on which a foreign national may be deemed inadmissible to Canada for “violating human or international rights. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 1:45 am by David Pocklington
Section 3 of the Burial Act 1853 makes it unlawful ‘to bury the dead’ in a closed churchyard, and the interment of cremated remains does not amount to the burial of the dead as intended by that statutory section. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 1:07 am by Florian Mueller
However, ALJ Elliot denied that motion yesterday, and as I'll discuss below, that decision does not appear well-reasoned or fair:ITC Inv. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 2:17 pm by Patricia Hughes
INTRODUCTION The Ford Government’s invocation of section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Bill 28 prohibiting education workers from striking and imposing a contract on them has once again raised cries of “this isn’t what the notwithstanding clause is for”. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 12:57 pm by Greg Lambert
Whether you loved it or hated it… Season One of She-Hulk: Attorney at Law is in the books. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 9:35 am by Angelina Cameron
But how do you do it, and what does it mean for your taxes and reporting requirements? [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 6:41 am by Schwartzapfel Lawyers P.C.
If a medical professional does not provide adequate patient care, they could risk their patient’s health. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 7:01 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
” The Executive Order generally directed the Department of Health and Human Services to coordinate with other federal officials to ensure the patent system does not unjustifiably delay generic and biosimilar competition. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm by INFORRM
The defendant’s reliance on the “consensus requirement” (a statement can only be defamatory if it imputes some conduct or quality that would seriously harm the claimant’s reputation in the eyes of “right-thinking members of society generally”) to argue that it does not cause someone serious harm to accuse them of being a “demonic prophet of Satan” in the twenty-first century failed; reference to twenty-first century standards is no basis to… [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 2:46 pm by Greg Lambert
Greg Lambert 4:35 I love the fact that that even Holloway was was was using it as well. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:48 pm by David Friedman
The author does not mention that, during the period of Walmart’s initial expansion, federal regulation made transport more expensive by cartelizing the trucking industry, as demonstrated by the sharp drop in costs after the industry was deregulated.[6] Nor does he mention that libertarians expect governments to produce goods and services less efficiently than private firms, making costs higher and quality lower. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 1:56 pm by zola.support.team
Calling pain and suffering damages an intangible or non-economic loss does not imply that these things do not have a financial value. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 7:59 am by John Elwood
” In its brief in opposition, the government contends that the decision does not “implicate any split of authority” and the case would be a “poor vehicle for reviewing the question presented. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Our approach, however, does not impose upon the warning necessary to show an informed choice the same requirements that govern cautions under the Charter. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 12:00 am by Rose Hughes
For the Board of Appeal, it was plausible from this in vitro data that "the mutated antibodies [could] be used as a medicament [...] without the mutations in the Fc region impairing the therapeutic effect (r. 35). [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
Rec. 25, 35, 38-39 (2021).[1]  And there was a time in which the Waterfront Commission succumbed to corruption. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
            What Fleming does is to present a supple and sophisticated theoretical structure for what the title calls the “basic liberties” that Americans legitimately expect to be protected in the 21stcentury, which very much includes reproductive choice. [read post]