Search for: "Doe Parties 1-100" Results 1561 - 1580 of 5,019
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2020, 8:19 am by DLA Piper
Previously, parties could only file a declaration if certain triggers were satisfied that would make such a filing mandatory; voluntary declarations were not allowed. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 8:19 am by DLA Piper
Previously, parties could only file a declaration if certain triggers were satisfied that would make such a filing mandatory; voluntary declarations were not allowed. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 10:23 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Contextual Analysis The Court’s contextual analysis considered the fact that the OHSTC’s analysis did not refer to section 135(1), which had been contested by the parties at the FCA. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm by Patricia Hughes
Despite the glee with which admin law academics and practitioners anticipated and met Vavilov, where does this actually leave us? [read post]
  The regulations provide detailed requirements for investors seeking to qualify for the tax benefits provided from an investment in one of the over 8,700 designated Opportunity Zones, codified as Sections 1400Z-1, and 1400Z-2 of the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:08 am by Kyle R. Fath
Code sections 6208.1(b) or 6254.21(c)(1) relates to a party’s status as a data broker, and those sections are not referred to or invoked in Calif. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:08 am by Kyle R. Fath
Code sections 6208.1(b) or 6254.21(c)(1) relates to a party’s status as a data broker, and those sections are not referred to or invoked in Calif. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 7:52 am by Matthias Weller
At para. 59, the Opinion explains the concept of “civil and commercial matters” abstractly with a view to previous case law and holds: [t]he Court has repeatedly held that it is the exercise of public powers by one of the parties to the case, inasmuch as it exercises powers falling outside the scope of the ordinary legal rules applicable to relationships between private individuals, that excludes such a case from civil and commercial matters within the meaning of… [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Accordingly, because the Final Order does not actually mandate that television service providers distribute a channel that broadcasts the Super Bowl, but instead simply imposes a condition on those that already do, its issuance was not authorized by s. 9(1) (h) of the Broadcasting Act. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 1:03 pm by Sophie Beiers
In Massachusetts, nearly 300 in 10,000 Black women had evictions filed against them that were dismissed — as compared to less than 100 in 10,000 white renters. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 9:54 am by The Murray Law Firm
What measures did the club take to deescalate the disturbance and safely remove the parties from the establishment? [read post]
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]