Search for: "Doe v. Attorney General" Results 1561 - 1580 of 20,992
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2013, 10:48 am by WSLL
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; John D. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:27 am by WSLL
Phillips, Wyoming Attorney General; David L. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 1:42 am by Jani
The interpretation of the Article in question hinges heavily, as discussed by the Attorney General, on the ECJ's earlier decision in Oliver Brüstle v Greenpeace, where the Court saw that "...any human ovum must, as soon as fertilised, be regarded as a ‘human embryo’ within the meaning and for the purposes of the application of Article... since that fertilisation is such as to commence the process of development of a human being". [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 10:08 am by Gregory B. Williams
The general takeaway from the case is as follows: just because one is a prevailing party, does not automatically mean that it will recover attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 10:08 am by Gregory B. Williams
The general takeaway from the case is as follows: just because one is a prevailing party, does not automatically mean that it will recover attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 8:24 am
As you may have read in various news reports, one David Jonathan Ross is suing the Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General of British Columbia and the Attorney General of Canada because, he claims, the R.C.M.P. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 8:00 am by Gabriel Chin
Code does not make it a crime for unauthorized migrants to be here, but it does make it a crime to facilitate their presence. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 9:47 am
As a general matter, the attorney's invoice offers the level of detail necessary to convey to the client - and a reviewing court (if your bills are ever disputed) the amount of work done. [read post]
6 May 2022, 8:10 am by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2021), en banc denied at GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:55 am
The Attorney General of New Hampshire argues that the correct procedural rule is the rule of United States v. [read post]