Search for: "Doe v. Attorney General"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 20,992
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2023, 2:04 pm
In Penalty Kick Management Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:18 pm
Shak v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 11:30 am
The point that Attorney General Weiser emphasized today is presumably why the majority of states–and most federal Courts of Appeals–have recognized that the First Amendment does not impose barriers to legislative action to criminalize "true threats. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
In his book, The Run of His Life, The People v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:32 pm
In a recent decision in City of Oxnard v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:48 am
The only limitation is a general admonition, set forth in the Attorney General’s Guidelines for Domestic FBI Operations, that “[a]ll activities under these Guidelines must have a valid purpose consistent with these Guidelines, and must be carried out in conformity with the Constitution and all applicable statutes, executive orders, Department of Justice regulations and policies, and Attorney General guidelines. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
He points to the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Trump v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
The court awarded Ms Nunn $400,000 in general damages for defamation and harassment and a further $250,000 in aggravated damages. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:34 am
Club Exploria, LLC v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:20 am
“The fact that the plaintiff subsequently was unhappy with the settlement [she] obtained . . . does not rise to the level of legal malpractice” (Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d at 1506 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 758; Holschauer v Fisher, 5 AD3d 553, 554). [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 8:41 am
Blake v. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm
From my experience lawsuits filed in federal court in New York are generally filed by firms with a least some ability to prosecute the suit. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 11:36 am
The Act does not specify whether this policy is meant to be separate from an entity’s more general consumer privacy notice. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
Congress made clear in the statute, the government says, that the attorney general has the power to resolve any ambiguities in the INA. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am
As a matter of English law, if a state, as principal, represents that a person had authority to act on its behalf, it will be bound by the acts of that person with respect to anyone dealing with him as an agent on the faith of that representation (Attorney General of Ceylon v Silva (AD) [1953] A.C. 461). [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 3:41 pm
For example in People v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 3:41 pm
For example in People v. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 8:41 am
See Shalala v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
The need for something like FISA was made clear as early as 1972, when the Supreme Court ruled in the famous Keith Case that electronic collection in domestic security cases fell within the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement as set forth in Katz v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:45 am
Although former Attorney General William Barr has argued that applying this longstanding rule in the Fox News lawsuit would deal a “major blow to media freedoms generally,” nothing could be further from the truth. [read post]
