Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
Further, the elements of the cause of action of negligence, together with the threshold stated by this Court in Mustapha v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
MDS Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
Dorman v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:52 am
Ruston v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 9:37 am
The conference’s languages will be Ukrainian, Russian, and English. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 2:50 pm
From Tomlinson v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
Canada’s Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) in Ron Matusalem & Matusa of Florida Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 3:04 pm
Because of Trump v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 9:41 am
It contained an arbitration clause which stated that, in the event of disagreement or dispute, the parties should appoint an arbitrator in Paris. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:50 am
In two recent decisions (“Unwired Planet” and “Conversant”) (Unwired Planet v Huawei [2018] EWCA Civ 2344, IPKat post here; Huawei v Conversant [2019] EWCA Civ 38, IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal has endorsed this practice.Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory? [read post]
29 May 2007, 11:45 am
He learned English and is active in his church and in his community. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
In Scott v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am
Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 15 May 2012. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 8:26 am
On 4 August 2022, the English Patents court handed down its decision in Shenzhen Carku Technology Co., Ltd v The NOCO Company, a case on battery-powered car jump starters. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Del Giudice v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:29 pm
" Simcox v.. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:54 am
In Mendoza v Silva, 2013 WL 6491479 (N.D.Iowa) Plaintiff Maria Guadalupe Aguilar Mendoza, a citizen of Mexico, filed an action to secure the return of her daughters, five-year-old K.G.M.A. and four-year-old M.K.M.A.. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 2:09 am
However, “materials published by Vedanta state that its ultimate control of KCM is not thereby to be regarded as any less than it would be if wholly owned”. [read post]
