Search for: "EVANS v. US " Results 1561 - 1580 of 2,365
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2012, 12:23 pm by admin
The Court reversed the decisions of the Alabama and Arkansas Supreme Courts, which had upheld the imposition of these sentences on Evan Miller and Kuntrell Jackson, both 14 at the time of their offenses. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
Case C-137/12 European Commission v Council of the European Union is a battle of the Euro-titans, with the European Commission picking on the Council on a matter of policy as well as principle. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:29 am by David Bernstein
Beyond that, using the term “civil liberties” broadly, the two most important such cases were Coppage v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 1:27 pm by Kent Scheidegger
The US Supreme Court today took up a double jeopardy case, Evans v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:00 am by Sung Un Kim
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] granted certiorari [order list, PDF] Monday in Evans v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm by Charon QC
” Natasha Phillips of Researching Reform writes: Government wants to end Blame Culture – By Blaming Others 11 KBW in Panopticon: Important new privacy judgment: police retention of protestor’s data not an Article 8 infringement The Admin Court (Gross LJ and Irwin J) has handed down judgment this week in Catt v Association of Chief Police Officers and Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2012] EWHC 1471 (Admin). [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 3:07 am by Njuguna
 The Court also considered but distinguished the South African case of Plascon-Evans Paints (TVL) Ltd. v Van Riebeck Paints (Pty) Ltd,  1984 (3) SA 623, relating to the marks MICATEX and MIKACOTE in which the two marks were found to be similar and likely to cause confusion. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:37 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Evans opinion that invalidated Colorado’s effort to use state law to marginalize a group of people, namely gay men and lesbians. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:01 am
Evans, 517 U.S. 620 (1996), we have now declared that animus must have been the only conceivable motivation for a sovereign State to have remained committed to a definition of marriage that has existed for millennia, Perry v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:58 am by Lyle Denniston
Evans] that would be unrecognizable to the Justices who joined it, to those who dissented from it, and to the judges from sister circuits who have since interpreted it. [read post]