Search for: "Edwards v. Means"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 1,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2011, 12:01 pm
Edward McNally explains that: Fletcher International LTD v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 11:13 am
Burrows, that train left the station in 2009 where another claimant made the same claim in Edwards v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 8:30 am
" the IPKat made a few observations about the Patents County Court ruling in Dame Vivienne Westwood v Anthony Edward Knight, the first time that court has been able to run a case under its exciting new procedures. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:33 am
Miller v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 12:45 pm
Partnering Against Poverty: Examining Cross-Disciplinary Approaches to Public Interest LawyeringBy Jenny Chung C’12A diverse array of panelists ranging from public-interest lawyers to academics to experts across various disciplines convened to discuss poverty issues within both Philadelphia and the broader national context at the University of Pennsylvania Law School’s 30th annual Edward V. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:59 am
Edwards, 415 US 800 (1974) found on the arrestee’s person. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 3:50 am
The IPKat's friend, IP practitioner and fellow blogger Peter Groves is very excited that his IP Dictionary has now been published by Edward Elgar Publishing. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 6:37 am
The court in Bear Creek Master Assn. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:06 pm
Justice Holmes' dissent in Lochner v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 12:15 pm
Weisman, and Edwards v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
In considering the meaning of “harassment”, Rix LJ drew upon the guidance of the Court of Appeal in Thomas v News Group Newspapers where Lord Phillips defined harassment as: “conduct targeted at an individual which is calculated to produce the consequences described in section 7 and which is oppressive and unreasonable”. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
LILES, EDWARD R. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
The spectre of discrimination claims, which has also been cited by Conservative MP Edward Leigh, has been rejected by the Government. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
The contents of the reference and the meaning of the claim are irrelevant in a procedural challenge.If the examiner failed to address a claim limitation (as is the norm in the 3690s business methods art units) or neglected an element of the prima facie case set forth in MPEP Chapter 2100, then an appeal brief meets its legal burden by simply pointing out the procedural failure. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Therefore, it would be an abuse of process to allow the claim to continue (referring to Jameel (Youssef) v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:35 am
Kelley v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 1:20 pm
Gerald Ung (left) and Edward DiDonato Jr. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 12:31 am
It also held that the priority right must have been assigned before the declaration of priority, which may occur after the filing of the subsequent application.That the priority right cannot be assigned retroactively is hardly a surprise (see Edwards Lifesciences AG v Cook Biotech Inc for the UK law on the issue). [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
