Search for: "Eli Lilly "
Results 1561 - 1580
of 2,131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am
On a recent celebratory birthday call, members of IP Federation (which today include BT, Dyson, GSK, Pfizer, Ocado, Arm, Microsoft, IBM, Rolls-Royce, Shell, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Ford and Eli Lilly) shared memories of their work, triumphs and tribulations. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 2:01 am
The new year sees the issue of yet another UK court case applying the doctrine of equivalents as established by the UK Supreme Court in Actavis v Eli Lilly ([2017] UKSC 48) ("Actavis"). [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:39 am
(Eli Lilly v Novopharm (2010 FCA 197)This exercise requires:Reviewing the entire specification (claims and entire disclosure)Identifying the promises made in the entire specification Determining whether the patent fulfils those promises by demonstration or sound prediction.This exercise is a question of law viewed through the skilled person at the time of filing (with the assistance of expert evidence) and has been applied in several cases (BMS v Apotex (2005 FC 1348),… [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 7:26 am
Had the patent been valid, it would have been infringed. (3) Plausibility and SPC's The Eli Lilly v Genentech proceedings do not only relate to a (typical) patent revocation/infringement action, but also involved an issue on third-party SPC applications. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:38 pm
Eli Lilly & Co. (1988) 44 Cal.3d. 1103, it starts running when the plaintiff suspects or should suspect that he or she has been wronged. . . . [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:09 pm
Cir. 1997) (hereinafter, Eli Lilly). [read post]
29 Jun 2006, 5:04 pm
But the combination of a new drug called pemetrexed, developed by Eli Lilly, with carboplatin could be an effective treatment for the hard-to-treat co [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 4:30 am
Eli Lilly, 2011 U.S. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 10:48 pm
This was Andrew’s characterisation of the riddle faced by Birss J in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2016] EWHC 1955 (Pat). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
It was the last blank space on the legal map – the only state with no precedent whatsoever. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
This post is only from the Reed Smith (more properly, the non-Dechert) side of the blog.One hundred what, you say? [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:37 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336 (Fed. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 1:42 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 119 F.3d 1559 (Fed. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 7:55 pm
Eli Lilly v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 9:29 am
Some of the other diabetes drugs being investigated include Bydureon and Onglyza, sold by Bristol-Myers Squibb; AstraZeneca and Victoza from Novo Nordisk; Tradjenta from Eli Lilly and Boehringer Ingelheim; and Nesina from Takeda. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:22 am
In this regard, in its judgment of 12 December 2013 (case C-493/12, Eli Lilly v Human Genome Sciences), the CJEU made the following observations: “30. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., 598 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 1:09 am
So far, seven states have filed Medicaid recovery suits against Eli Lilly over the way it promoted Zyprexa. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 9:04 am
The proposal is now pending at Altria, Amgen, Chevron, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Wyeth. [read post]
