Search for: "Estate of Miller"
Results 1561 - 1580
of 1,761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2022, 6:05 am
Chaya Raichik, the former real estate agent behind LibsOfTikTok, the Twitter account that drew paramilitary and militia attention to Coeur d’Alene has spent the remainder of the summer and early fall picking other targets for violent anti-trans neo-nazis and militias to aim their vitriol at. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
In one notable example, Miller v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:39 am
The majority in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales held that the fact that the Millers had “come to the nuisance” was no defense. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
The United States will continue to support Israel with military assistance, State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said yesterday. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 6:04 pm
” Miller v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:21 am
In Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane (2006), the Supreme Court articulated the principles of needs, compensation, and sharing as applied to both matrimonial and non-matrimonial assets. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 5:22 am
Additionally, the State of Nevada passed a new law that makes it a felony and threatens to hold individuals criminally liable for making false representations concerning real estate title. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 2:15 pm
This dedication to strong client relationships is evidenced throughout the firm’s marketing messages, but particularly in the tagline, “Kean Miller, Your Counsel. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
On May 12, 2022, the First District Court of Appeal filed a 108-page published opinion affirming a judgment denying a CEQA writ petition that challenged Marin County’s approval of a 43-lot single-family residential subdivision on a 110-acre parcel atop a mountain overlooking the Town of Tiburon and San Francisco Bay. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 10:20 am
In an opinion filed August 27 and later ordered published on September 24, 2024, the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment denying a writ petition that challenged the State Air Resources Board’s (CARB) adoption of the Advanced Clean Trucks Regulation (Regulation) on CEQA and Administrative Procedures Act (APA; Gov. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
In a lengthy published opinion filed November 29, 2016, the First District Court of Appeal rejected all legal challenges to the City of San Francisco’s Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR) and related land use approvals for a 488,000-square-foot multipurpose event center project on 11 acres in the City’s Mission Bay South redevelopment plan area (the “Project”). [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
On September 18, 2015, I posted a “Part I” piece on the “efficiency improvements” category of OPR’s Preliminary Discussion Draft of its “Proposed Updates to the CEQA Guidelines” (the “Discussion Draft”). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:08 pm
In an important published opinion filed February 16, 2024, the Fourth District Court of Appeal (Div. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 8:51 pm
Introduction And Overview On August 19, 2019, the California Supreme Court issued its unanimous 38-page opinion, authored by Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye, in the CEQA “project definition” case we’ve been tracking with interest. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 8:46 am
In an opinion filed on July 24, and later ordered published on August 19, 2024, the Second District Court of Appeal (Div. 4) affirmed the trial court’s judgment denying a writ petition challenging actions taken by the Los Angeles City Planning Commission (“CPC”) to facilitate and implement three components of the Westside Mobility Plan (the “Mobility Plan”). [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:53 pm
In a partially-published, 150-page slip opinion resolving appeals in consolidated cases, and filed February 25, 2020, the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed in part and reversed in part a trial court decision finding CEQA defects in the 1800-plus page EIR prepared for Kern County’s adoption of an ordinance designed to provide a streamlined, ministerial permitting process for new oil and gas wells in the county. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
In a published opinion filed December 6, 2022, the Third District Court of Appeal reversed in part and affirmed in part the trial court’s judgment denying writ petitions in consolidated actions challenging the EIR for a major state government project affecting the Historic State Capitol Building and Annex in Sacramento. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 4:54 pm
In a published opinion filed October 21, 2024, the Second District Court of Appeal (Div. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 5:48 pm
In a 5-2 opinion filed August 1, 2022, a divided California Supreme Court held the Federal Power Act (“FPA”; 16 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am
In a 51-page published opinion filed January 5, 2024, and resolving consolidated appeals, the Third District Court of Appeal rejected baseline, piecemealing/segmentation, impact analysis, project description, alternatives analysis, and failure-to-recirculate challenges to the EIR for the Department of Water Resources’ (“DWR”) approval of amendments to long-term water supply contracts with local government agencies receiving water through the State Water Project (“SWP”). [read post]
