Search for: "GRAY v. GRAY" Results 1561 - 1580 of 2,721
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2025, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
” He did so even though the question of whether the children of people not lawfully in the United States became citizens at birth was resolved more than 100 years ago.In United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 10:50 pm
" Full article: The Observer.Ben Butler's case reminds us the justice system is not infallibleEmma Sherrington, who represented Ben Butler in London Borough of Sutton v Gray & Ors [see last week's News Update], discusses the case, in The Guardian.BLOGSThe importance of being formalA discussion of the private law case of Re K (A child) 2012 EWCA Civ 1306 [above]. [read post]
20 May 2010, 9:42 pm by Simon Gibbs
Section 29 is specific and has been interpreted by the Court of Appeal in Callery v Gray. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am by INFORRM
The first, Godfrey v Demon Internet ([2001] EWHC QB 201) and the second, Bunt v Tilley ([2006] EWHC 407 (QB)) involved the liability of ISPs, the third Metropolitan International Schools Limited v Design Technica Corp. ([2009] EWHC 1765 (QB)), the liability of Google for results generated by its search engine. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Google v. myTriggers (Technology & Marketing Law Blog)   US Patents – Decisions District Court N D California: Delay filing suit and failure to seek preliminary injunction negate claim of prejudice from stay pending reexam: Network Appliance Inc v Sun Microsystems Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D Ohio: Plaintiff not required to limit number of asserted claims: EMSAT Advanced Geo-Location Technology, LLC et al v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Google v. myTriggers (Technology & Marketing Law Blog)   US Patents – Decisions District Court N D California: Delay filing suit and failure to seek preliminary injunction negate claim of prejudice from stay pending reexam: Network Appliance Inc v Sun Microsystems Inc (Docket Report) District Court N D Ohio: Plaintiff not required to limit number of asserted claims: EMSAT Advanced Geo-Location Technology, LLC et al v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
  Here's what went down:"At about 10:30 a.m. or 10:45 a.m. on February 2, 2009, Joshua Castrillon and his girlfriend, Silvia Arellano, left their Chula Vista home and drove her 2007 dark gray 530i BMW to Pacific Beach to have breakfast at Rocky's restaurant. [read post]