Search for: "Greenhouse v. Greenhouse" Results 1561 - 1580 of 2,365
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
Environmental LawKF3812.2 .R43 2010 Recent developments in greenhouse gas regulations : leading lawyers on understanding the impact of global politics, navigating climate change concerns, and staying up-to-date on reporting requirements. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 8:23 am by Amanda Frost
According to conventional wisdom, the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:43 pm by WIMS
Emissions Of Greenhouse Gases In The United States 2009 Karuk Tribe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm by WIMS
EPW Hearing State & Local Perspectives On Transportation Morrison Enterprises  v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:30 am by Amanda Rice
Jeff Skilling, former Enron CEO and Petitioner in the 2010 case Skilling v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:26 pm by Reproductive Rights
Linda Greenhouse (Yale Law School) & Reva Siegel (Yale Law School) have posted Before (and after) Roe v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:40 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
Overturn the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision, in Massachusetts v EPA, holding that greenhouse gases (GHGs) constitute “air pollution” within the meaning of the Clean Air Act and that EPA has the duty to regulate it if the agency finds that GHG emissions endanger health and welfare; . [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 10:40 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
In the 2010 Supreme Court of British Columbia case of CMIC Mortgage Investment Corp. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:37 pm by WIMS
These endless subsidies only increase the economic pain Americans are suffering, as do the greenhouse gas regulations and similar mandates the Environmental Protection Agency is imposing on our economy that drive up energy costs without improving our environment. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 6:46 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
"Make no mistake: this is a battle to the death" http://j.mp/eK5LsA #auspol linda greenhouse looks at the current term of the us supreme court ... [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 3:53 am by traceydennis
Republic of Latvia (supported by Republic of Lithuania and Slovak Republic intervening) v European Commission (supported by United Kingdom intervening) (Case T-369/07);  [2011] WLR (D)  101 “The three-month time limit under article 9(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC during which the Commission might reject a member state’s plan stating the total quantity of greenhouse gas emission allowance that it intended to allocate, started to run from the initial… [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:33 pm by Kent Scheidegger
I have been critical of Linda Greenhouse's NYT writings on the Supreme Court from time to time, but this article with the above title is well worth reading. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 2:56 pm by William H. Holmes
Legal News Alert from Stoel Rives Environmental Law Group   March 23, 2011 San Francisco Superior Court has issued a final decision in Association of Irritated Residents v. [read post]