Search for: "HUDSON V. STATE" Results 1561 - 1580 of 1,685
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Connection between liquid sugar consumption and greater health problems v. solid food. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 2:11 pm by Robert Rouder (US)
The Caronia Effect For this reason, many observers saw the December 2012 decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
Appellate Ruling Rejects Appointment of Special Litigation Committee in LLC Derivative Suit Where Not Authorized By Operating Agreement LNYC Loft, LLC v Hudson Opportunity Fund I, LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 06147 [1st Dept Aug. 15, 2017]. [read post]
28 Aug 2017, 3:39 am by Peter Mahler
Appellate Ruling Rejects Appointment of Special Litigation Committee in LLC Derivative Suit Where Not Authorized By Operating Agreement LNYC Loft, LLC v Hudson Opportunity Fund I, LLC, 2017 NY Slip Op 06147 [1st Dept Aug. 15, 2017]. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
  A snapshot of recent cases, for example, shows that £10,000 can easily be incurred by one party just to get to strike out or summary judgement (see reports on Lait v Evening Standard, Kordowski v Hudson, Robins v Kordowski) – and for some cases this incredibly conservative (Apsion v Butler). [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 12:55 pm by Will
’” Id. at *9 (quoting Central Hudson Gas & Elec. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Russell Beck
Nevada: The United States District Court for the District of Nevada held in Switch Communications Group v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Article 6 of the Civil Rights Law provides a formal procedure for changing a name, which provides the advantages of being speedy, definite and a matter of record as was done in Smith v United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 12:51 am
Weissman argued that for nearly a century, judges, prosecutors and defense lawyers had misconstrued a 1909 Supreme Court decision, called New York Central and Hudson River Railroad v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:01 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
"According to its Web site, the protesters are part of a Woodstock-based group of Hudson Valley residents "joined in support of human rights for Palestinians and an end to the US's aggressive policies in the Middle East. [read post]