Search for: "Harris v. Does" Results 1561 - 1580 of 3,598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2015, 6:44 pm by Bill Marler
Approximately 12% of asymptomatic food handlers were carriers for one of the norovirus genotypes. [28] This was the first report of norovirus molecular epidemiology relating asymptomatic individuals to outbreaks, suggesting that asymptomatic individuals are an important link in the infectivity pathway. [15, 28] Asymptomatic infection may occur because some people may have acquired immunity, which explains why some show symptoms upon infection and some do not. [16, 28, 33] Such immunity does… [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 2:41 pm by Amy Howe
”  Even if they were mistaken, Scalia continued, “that doesn’t show a bad motive on their part, does it? [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm by Elina Saxena
The Daily Beast's Shane Harris and Nancy Youssef reveal that an unreleased congressional report suggests that the exchange of Bowe Bergdahl for five Taliban prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay was politically motivated. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am by INFORRM
” However, Dr Evan Harris of campaign group Hacked Off said: “These changes are not merely cosmetic, they water down the code in a number of important areas. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 1:57 pm by Amy Howe
  Until 2013, when the Supreme Court issued its decision in a case called Shelby County v. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 11:06 am by Dan Ernst
But as McMahon observes, if the high court ruled to enforce Brown v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 12:35 pm by Stephen M. Fuerch
The answer correctly summarized the state of the law of mixed-motive defenses following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Harris v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am by Ronald Collins
What does your book add to the biographical mix and our understanding of Earl Warren? [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am by Ben
Fiona McGugan also suggested that the rental right (which does offer the much needed Equitable Remuneration) could play a part. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 1:43 pm
., where defendant agreed to plead guilty to X offense, in return for Y sentence, but now seeks relief (as authorized by Proposition 47) to reduce the X offense to a misdemeanor and hence only have to serve a sentence of less-than-Y.So does the passage of Proposition 47 allow the prosecution to retroactively withdraw from the plea agreement, even after the defendant has (as here) served years in prison, or do we assume that both parties (the prosecution and the defense) are bound because… [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 9:11 am by Mara Hatfield
  The argument states that “Justice Harry Anstead noted the “open issue” in a 2007 (Marsh v. [read post]